31
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Dot@feddit.org to c/technology@lemmy.world
  • Signal forks can have unexpected behaviours like retaining deleted messages and also they don't get updated at the same rate that Signal get updated.

  • Every couple of years I hear a story about hackers disturbing signal with backdoors, which would be impossible or very hard to be done If they blocked third party clients. (Ex: 1)

  • The amount of people who use third party Signal clients are very few anyway.

I saw what WhatsApp did to forbid modification of it's app which works in stopping a lot of distributions, why doesn't Signal do the same?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jet@hackertalks.com 10 points 1 month ago
[-] progandy@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

This is the way. I might be open to switch back if they [signal] added [official] support for unified push, though

[-] jet@hackertalks.com 1 points 1 month ago
[-] progandy@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I know. I meant switch back to signal if signal added official support.

this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2024
31 points (78.2% liked)

Technology

59670 readers
1833 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS