275
Many voters are willing to accept misinformation from political leaders – even when they know it’s factually inaccurate, if they believe the statements evoke a deeper, more important “truth.” (theconversation.com)
submitted 1 month ago by solrize@lemmy.world to c/science@lemmy.world
54 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Many voters are willing to accept misinformation from political leaders – even when they know it’s factually inaccurate. According to our research, voters often recognize when their parties’ claims are not based on objective evidence. Yet they still respond positively, if they believe these inaccurate statements evoke a deeper, more important “truth.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Let me frame this like so:

It's just another example of capitalist for-profit corporations that maximize profits while offloading their negative externalities onto the rest of us.

They know they're making money when they tell lies and they don't care about the downstream effects. For some the downstream effects might even be desirable.

Another way to frame it is: corporate media makes money, with informing (or disinforming) the public as a byproduct.

this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2024
275 points (97.3% liked)

science

14890 readers
12 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
m3t00@lemmy.world
Joleee@lemmy.world
laverabe@lemmy.world
DeadPand@midwest.social