182
submitted 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) by Dot@feddit.org to c/technology@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 30 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Good. There's a lot of non-programmers who are now bad ones and are using AI to make their ideas real. It's made programming way more accessible to people who would never learn before.

Great, the next generation of software will be bug-ridden, insecure, single-use shit.

[-] Hackworth@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

The next generation?

[-] Sabata11792@ani.social 14 points 15 hours ago

I got back into programming because I can ask an Ai my stupid questions I'm too dumb to google correctly. I haven't otherwise wrote code since college and kinda revived a long dead hobby. It removes a barrier to entry that I otherwise gave up on. Been working on a project to teach myself python the last few months, with Ai replacing the roll of google for the most part.

Copy-pasting Ai code still blows up in your face just as much as code you stole from stack overflow...

[-] uis@lemm.ee 3 points 7 hours ago

Copy-pasting Ai code still blows up in your face just as much as code you stole from stack overflow...

Show me difference:

They are the same.

[-] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 2 points 6 hours ago

Why we gotta do Derpy like that?

[-] uis@lemm.ee 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Because we just don't know what went wrong.

[-] LucidNightmare@lemm.ee 8 points 12 hours ago

I wouldn't say you're dumb when it comes to Google. Their search is just a broken mess of dog shit now.

[-] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 0 points 7 hours ago

The issue isn't you doing your hobby projects however you want, it's people being paid and produce LLM generated code.

And the biggest issue is managers/c-suites thinking that LLMs can replace senior devs.

And the biggest biggest issue is that the LLMs in their current mainstream form are terribly bad for the environment.

[-] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 hours ago

Why wouldn't you use AI as a shortcut if you can? Can you actually replace senior devs with AI? I'm sure that depends on the company and what they consider a "senior dev". Maybe there's some not-so-senior senior devs that should be worried.

Learning how to do research is a big part of being an engineer. You should be able to either find an answer, or build your own. Being told how to do something is not learning.

[-] chakan2@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

No...stack I can usually figure out from the context of questions what went wrong. AI will very confidently and eloquently give you a very subtle bullshit answer.

[-] raker@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago

Can confirm. Using AI for coding for a couple of months now. There sure is a lot of copy and paste, trail and error, but without the assistance I would not have been able to enhance and customize code like that. Now I am some steps further and was even able to question the AI output, correct it, made it better. I am getting there: learning, optimizing, creating new stuff. It is fun. And when I compile the code, it runs. If not, I debug. Unthinkable for me a year ago.

this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
182 points (86.4% liked)

Technology

58810 readers
4546 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS