94
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
94 points (100.0% liked)
World News
22028 readers
197 users here now
Breaking news from around the world.
News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
- Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
- Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
- Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
- Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
For US News, see the US News community.
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I know someone in corporate McDonalds. They were pissed the instant they found out. They have a saying internally, "were not red or blue, were golden." They intentionally don't take political stances. This franchise owner acted without corporate blessing, and if I had to guess, that message was intentionally not passed up the chain.
If that is true then wouldn't that be the message?
We don't take sides, and this franchise did, so he can't be a franchise owner anymore. Sell something that isn't McDonald's.
I don't think that was their message. Their message was, "please don't be mad at us. " Like someone else said in this thread, this doesn't change my opinion of McDonald's and I already wasn't eating there. I just see their excuse as another BS reason.
That's really interesting that they don't take political stances, yet why was it such a necessity for them to go out of their way and deliver their food to IOF troops and support their work? That must have been okayed by corporate because it was on a ton of media outlets. Seems pretty political to me.
The whole situation around Israel has bipartisan support. Even if it's political, it's hard to say they're picking a side there.
And it turns out there aren't a lot of franchises in Palestine.