148
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 40 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Can someone explain what this means? Isnt the whole wordpress stack open source? What relevance does this guy have?

[-] LesserAbe@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

Do you know about how Android is open source, but Google has moved a bunch of important functionality to Google Services which makes Android less desirable without them?

From my understanding it's not nearly as bad as that with WordPress, but similar in that some functionality relies on non-open source stuff that this guy Matt and his company automatic control.

He's mad that competitor company WP Engine doesn't contribute back to the project, so he's making a lot of noise and making moves to limit their access.

[-] Jivebunny@lemmy.world 0 points 48 minutes ago* (last edited 47 minutes ago)

Imo, the problem is that wpengine is a direct competitor to mullenberg's own commercial exploitation of the open source stack WordPress. He also owns automattic, which offers WordPress hosting, just like wpengine. If you ask me, the owner of the open source stack shouldn't also be able to dictate which other companies make money of it, when he does this himself with automattic, aka WordPress.com.

Then again I'm only involved through my profession. Privately I enjoy ghost.org.

[-] Ab_intra@lemmy.world 15 points 5 hours ago

Have the same question. It seems to be open source but if they wanted to they could make it closed source for sure..

[-] henfredemars@infosec.pub 37 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

They cannot make WordPress closed source because it’s released under the GPL, which means that any closed implementation cannot use this code.

With that said, the linked article is about access to wordpress.org, which is different from the source code of the project. I’m not entirely sure what this is about.

[-] Glitch@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 47 minutes ago

It's like Nestle taking water and selling it for profit. Except, this watering hole was built and maintained by everyone. Now, we all have to do more work to build and maintain, so Nestle can take more water. Matt, the guy who kinda invited everyone to the watering hole, is like "they gotta help maintain this watering hole, obviously!"

[-] taladar@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 hours ago

This is basically about the infrastructure for plugin update checks and similar centralized services.

[-] rtxn@lemmy.world 9 points 5 hours ago

They can, but only if all contributors agree or their work is removed entirely, and only future releases (code released prior to that is still GPL).

[-] auroz@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 5 hours ago

I don't know what the governance setup is like, but in theory the owners of the project can change the license to whatever they like at any time.

The catch is that this doesn't affect old versions, which remain available under the old license. So they could make WP closed-source or make the license more restrictive, but WP-engine or any portion of the community could make a fork and maintain the open source version from there. It wouldn't have the features added by the mainline WP project since the license change (and they'd likely have to change the branding), but that's about all that would be lost.

Similar things have happened in the past: see OpenOffice becoming LibreOffice for example.

[-] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Nah wordpress would instantly die if it went closed source. So many businesses only function the way they do because wordpress is easily customizable.

It would just get forked by some big webhosting company.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

There's a strong current of people who believe the WP fight with WPEngine is bad on this guy's behalf. He's megalomaniacal, he's being a spoiled rich guy, stuff like that.

Personally I don't see it, but I may not know enough about it. But I see this as a part of that conversation. Someone's arguing that fighting with a private corporate business whose model depends on exploiting the software they have no intention of supporting is outrageous and he's Gone Too Far.

[-] Dot@feddit.org 7 points 5 hours ago

Mainly, .org can block anyone from updating their software(if they are set as the update provider on your Wordpress distribution) and accessing their addons repo( which is very essential to how some websites work)

this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
148 points (95.1% liked)

People Twitter

5034 readers
2301 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS