513
submitted 1 year ago by NightOwl@lemm.ee to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] 133arc585@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago

the worth of the guns and tanks and other things we’ve been giving them that were just collecting dust over here?

Use of reserves motivates replacement. Just because you're giving them weapons that were produced in the past, and therefore whose (production) cost has already been incurred, doesn't mean that occurs in a vacuum. With stock running low, contemporary money goes in to replenishing that stock. In effect, there's no difference whether you send old or new equipment, because both incur costs in the present.

No actual money was involved and so didn’t really cost us anything.

It cost you exactly the amount it cost to produce them. Just because it was produced in the past, doesn't mean it was free. You paid for it X years ago, and are only now seeing it used. You paid for it. Moreover, you're now going to pay to replace it.

[-] zackwithak@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Who are we kidding. You think they wouldn’t just create excess anyways?

[-] polskilumalo@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Who are you kidding thinking they don't want to have a constant state of excess? It will be replaced, it has to be bought.

[-] zackwithak@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Idk I guess if the military budget increases significantly more in budget to back fill I’ll believe this. But im pretty sure we’re just giving away old shit that is already being replaced with newer models

load more comments (2 replies)
this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023
513 points (95.2% liked)

World News

32289 readers
550 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS