213
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2024
213 points (95.7% liked)
Technology
60492 readers
1754 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
So they say but since it never even went into space it's a bold claim.
I'm reading that it orbited at an altitude of up to 263 km, well above the Karman line. Is that not space?
Well that's debatable but really the point is it never did a re-entry so we really don't know how reusable it would have been.
If it didn't do a reentry, how did it get down from that altitude?
By landing?
Reentry doesn't mean flying downwards it means actually coming in at a high enough speed to generate heating. Otherwise it's just falling.
I'm pretty sure any reentry from orbit is going to involve high enough speeds to generate heating.
It's just like their foxbat claims...turned out it was a flying brick.
Edit: apparently I pissed off some tankies lol
It's well known that the foxbat was heavily exaggerated in its capabilities. It's how we ended up with the f15 and it's insane capabilities. Just like now russia fighting in Ukraine, paper tiger.