606

Summary

Former Fox News host Tucker Carlson claimed he was “physically mauled” by a demon in his sleep, leaving claw marks on his body, which he says are still visible. Carlson described waking with intense pain, bleeding claw marks, and an overwhelming urge to read the Bible. He recounted the experience as confusing yet transformative, adding that while he doesn’t expect others to believe him, the incident profoundly impacted him.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Dasus@lemmy.world 69 points 1 week ago

"I got attacked while I was asleep with my wife and four dogs and mauled, physically mauled." ... "I have no idea what happened."

lol

[-] m0darn@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This is the level of critical thinking that conservative pundits are exercising.

[-] Zementid@feddit.nl 5 points 1 week ago

4.. FOUR Dogs? Imagine the smell...

[-] Dasus@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

I'm actually a bit jealous of his sleeping situation. I don't mind dogs being "dirty" and I'd prefer 4 dogs (and maybe a wife) to sleeping alone.

[-] nomous@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Plus he's rich so nbd to have a huge bed and have your dogs groomed every other day.

[-] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

He claims the dogs were sleeping but, who knows. 🤷‍♂️

[-] Good_morning@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 1 week ago

Knowing dogs, even if they were sleeping they'd be on their feet barking before he could fully get out of bed.

Normal people - I bet my dog accidentally scratch me.

Him- the devil sent his demons to scratch me!

[-] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

The way he explains this... I don't know. There are a lot of details regarding how he explains this that makes me believe him. Believe, as in, I believe that he believes he's telling the truth. He really believes what he is saying. He really doesn't understand what has happened, and so forth.

It's all in the way he exposes this. It doesn't seem like it's his agenda to do so. He hasn't tried to since it happened, and he didn't force it in this interview, it just kind of "came up". Among other details, e.g. "I don't care who believes me", etc.

I don't know, it's very curious. Only God knows what happened. 😊

[-] futatorius@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

It's all an act. Carlson is no genius, but he's not stupid, either. This is all a show he puts on to keep the rubes engaged.

this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2024
606 points (96.9% liked)

politics

19088 readers
1674 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS