271
submitted 2 weeks ago by neme@lemm.ee to c/python@programming.dev
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 6 points 2 weeks ago

I dunno if you're being deliberately obtuse, but just in case you really did miss his point: the fact that type hints are optional (and not especially popular) means many libraries don't have them. It's much more painful to use a library without type hints because you lose all of their many benefits.

This obviously isn't a problem in languages that require static types (Go, Rust, Java, etc..) and it isn't a problem with Typescript because static types are far more popular in JavaScript/Typescript land so it's fairly rare to run into a library that doesn't have them.

And yeah you can just not use the library at all but that's just ignoring the problem.

True, but if you're looking at a Python library that doesn't have type hints in 2024, then chances are that it's not very good and/or not very well maintained.

[-] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 1 points 2 weeks ago

Well, indeed. Unfortunately there are still a fair number of them. The situation is definitely improving at least.

this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2024
271 points (98.2% liked)

Python

6394 readers
18 users here now

Welcome to the Python community on the programming.dev Lemmy instance!

📅 Events

PastNovember 2023

October 2023

July 2023

August 2023

September 2023

🐍 Python project:
💓 Python Community:
✨ Python Ecosystem:
🌌 Fediverse
Communities
Projects
Feeds

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS