-8

Seem like not endorsing the government or the blue party will get you banned for trolling at climate@slrpnk.net

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] index@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 week ago

Which in an electoral college system means you want votes to be wasted and increase the risk the orange menace wins, who is the bigger enemy of the climate cause and of humanity.

There's not such thing as "wasted votes". In elections every person is free to vote as they want for whoever they like, that's the core of democracy. Trump alone is a corrupted politicians who represent the interests of elites and corporations, there's a climate crisis because for decades governments have facilitated and paved the way for earth exploitation.

Basically your words contradict your goals at the moment and it even raises the suspicion you’re trying to manipulate ppl for the GOP or foreign actors (which favor the GOP).

Go ahead and explain what's contradictory about any of my words. If you believe calling out the whole fucking government red and blue buffoons together is supporting any of them i'm lead to believe you are either malicious or extremely brainwashed.

If you wanted a 3rd party to win this election, that ship has sailed.

Unless you come from the future you cannot predict who is gonna win.

[-] lurch@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

There's not such thing as "wasted votes".

In electoral college and winner-takes-it-all systems (like the one in use in that election) votes for candidates not endorsed by large groups of voters have no effect on the outcome. You can lie to yourself, but this is not a European country. If a party doesn't get a huge group of voters committed long before the election, it's over for them.

Yes, people can vote for whoever they like, but only two options ultimately count. The rest is basically discarded on the electors stage.

[-] AnarchistsForKamala@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

votes for candidates not endorsed by large groups of voters have no effect on the outcome

i think 2016 jill stein voters are owed an apology then. and the 2000 nader voters

[-] index@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 week ago

All it takes for a party to get a huge group of voters is a pop start with a huge group of fans endorsing the party

[-] DmMacniel@feddit.org 4 points 1 week ago

And this will never happen in the US, which is in dire need of an election reform.

[-] lurch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Wanna bet? It's either Trump or Harris. You think like a loser.

[-] index@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 week ago

If you want i'm gonna bet that regardless of who win climate crisis will get worst and people will get poorer

this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2024
-8 points (31.8% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

0 readers
31 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.

Rules

Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 3 months ago