987
submitted 1 week ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Summary

Eighteen-year-old Nevaeh Crain died from sepsis after Texas’s abortion ban delayed critical medical intervention during her pregnancy complications.

Despite multiple ER visits and severe symptoms, doctors waited to confirm fetal demise before acting due to the state’s restrictive laws. Crain endured intense pain and deteriorating health over multiple hospital visits, ultimately suffering a miscarriage and passing away from internal bleeding.

Medical experts believe timely intervention could have saved her. Her mother, Candace Fails, is pursuing legal accountability but faces significant legal hurdles under Texas’s stringent emergency care standards.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 48 points 1 week ago

"Since her death, Fails has sought legal action to hold the hospitals accountable."

Wrong target. You go after the politicians who passed the law that killed your daughter.

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 week ago

If you close down all the hospitals with lawsuits, the politicians will be held accountable. One would hope, at least.

[-] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

What are you talking about?

Are you saying that instead of suing the hospital, she should start up a PAC to go after hundreds of Texas state politicians...?

Because if you meant sue them for wrongful death, they are exempt. So even if they are more directly culpable in their daughter's death, she cannot bring direct legal action against them for that.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Criminal action. They directly killed her daughter.

[-] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You are aware that legislatures cannot be held directly criminally responsible for the laws they pass, right?

I'm not disputing that their actions killed their daughter, I'm trying to explain to you that they cannot be held legally responsible in the manor you're suggesting.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Shouldn't stop anyone from trying. The press alone would be worth it.

[-] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

There wouldn't be any press....

No lawyer would take the case. Hell, a lawyer might even get sanctioned for even attempting to file it.

This isn't like an uphill legal battle where there's a process that can draw attention. It's a non-starter.

Pretend you file a lawsuit by filling out a form online, but whenever you try and submit this lawsuit, it goes to 404 not found. You're suggesting they spend thousands of dollars, for a 404 error.

However, suing the hospital, is a very long and drawn out legal process.... So if your goal is to bring attention to the issue, well there you have it.

[-] sour@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago

It's indirect.

this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2024
987 points (98.8% liked)

News

23287 readers
2030 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS