897
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] CanadaPlus@futurology.today 9 points 1 week ago

I mean, you could just use a vaguely smarter filter. A tiny "L"LM might have different problems, but not this one.

[-] tja@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 week ago
[-] CanadaPlus@futurology.today 6 points 1 week ago
[-] tja@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago

¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

[-] Carighan@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Awww, it's trying its best!

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Indeed; it definitely would show some promise. At that point, you'd run into the problem of needing to continually update its weighting and models to account for evolving language, but that's probably not a completely unsolvable problem.

So maybe "never" is an exaggeration. As currently expressed, though, I think I can probably stand by my assertion.

this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2024
897 points (98.8% liked)

Programmer Humor

19564 readers
1369 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS