901
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] CanadaPlus@futurology.today 9 points 2 months ago

I mean, you could just use a vaguely smarter filter. A tiny "L"LM might have different problems, but not this one.

[-] tja@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 months ago
[-] CanadaPlus@futurology.today 6 points 2 months ago
[-] tja@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago

¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

[-] Carighan@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Awww, it's trying its best!

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Indeed; it definitely would show some promise. At that point, you'd run into the problem of needing to continually update its weighting and models to account for evolving language, but that's probably not a completely unsolvable problem.

So maybe "never" is an exaggeration. As currently expressed, though, I think I can probably stand by my assertion.

this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2024
901 points (98.8% liked)

Programmer Humor

19976 readers
1223 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS