435

Tech tycoon Elon Musk joined a call between US President-elect Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky the day after the presidential election, according to a source with knowledge of the situation.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] mongooseofrevenge@lemmy.world 196 points 2 weeks ago

Remember when we had a whole impeachment hearing against Trump for withholding aid to Ukraine so he could get a political hit piece on Biden? I'm wondering how long it will take before a quid pro quo scenario pops up again. Either in Ukraine or elsewhere. So ya, we're all feeling for Zelensky in the next few years.

[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 87 points 2 weeks ago

There will be no agreements.

trump is going to change US policy to excluding all intelligence and military support and will "leak" all known military intel to putin.

[-] WhatsHerBucket@lemmy.world 26 points 2 weeks ago

As though nobody considered what he was actually doing with all those confidential documents.

[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 22 points 2 weeks ago

Don't worry. He was just confused last time and totally will never steal and leak sensitive information ever again because that would be against the law. Just like he won't extend his presidency or rig an election because that would violate the constitution.

We've been seeing this shit for months. At first I thought it was just contrarian dumbasses. But I have increasingly realized that this is people convincing themselves that it was fine to vote for trump. Oh, he wasn't REALLY going to do anything to violate teh constitution when he led an armed insurrection against the capital and was just buying time for rudy g to solve things. Oh, he isn't going to serve the country to putin because all those heroic men and women in uniform will stop him this time for real.

It is fucking idiocy.

[-] WhatsHerBucket@lemmy.world 27 points 2 weeks ago

As a 4th generation veteran, it makes so angry to think how many people died in the name of democracy and suddenly half the population is choosing for someone intending to end it to run the show.

We’re in for some dark times ahead.

[-] 800XL@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

And a lot of those people are the children of parents that fought/died in WW2 against the Nazis, and had family or children even that fought/died against dictators like the one they fucking elected!

Not only that, but they tried to overthrow the government their family died defending for this charlatan. It's so pathetic my brain goes in loops trying to understand the absolute madness of it.

[-] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

With everything else, I somehow forgot about those documents

[-] zante@slrpnk.net -1 points 2 weeks ago

And all those 5* Generals and going to stand by and salute ?

You really don’t understand America .

[-] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago

Someone in another thread said that Trump could fire generals until he gets someone who is willing to use troops domestically.

[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 14 points 2 weeks ago

He honestly wouldn't need to.

In a past life I worked with a LOT of senior military folk for the purpose of grants and funding and the like. And basically anyone (guesstimating) above the rank of a Captain equivalent (outside of SF) is basically a lifer. And they very rapidly learn how political the upper echelons are and that they need to stay as neutral as possible to get further promotions and have good assignments.

I could very much see various Lieutenants and even some Captains complain about leaving the Ukrainians to die. They will then be immediately told by the nearest Major or General that they are a disgrace to the uniform for refusing orders and blah blah blah. And that will propagate down the line so that the NCO who is ACTUALLY valued for their initiative understands that they will be brought up on treason if they violate these orders.

Because those Generals? They build their entire lives around always being able to say "I was just following orders". They KNOW when you get things in writing.

[-] zante@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 weeks ago

That’s not even worth comment. Was it LemmyUnder11 or something ?

A president can’t a fire a general. He cannot fire a dozen generals an retain control of the military.

[-] BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

The president can't? Let's see of the Supreme Court has anything to say about that. Right now, I'm not confident the word can't is in their dictionary as far as a president is concerned.

[-] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

Since Trump technically can't commit crimes as a president, nothing is stopping him from killing the generals until they comply.

[-] zante@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 weeks ago

Theres an unfortunate autocorrect there that confuses my point :

The president CAN fire a general, but he cannot fire 12 generals . That’s the point I want to make.

[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 weeks ago

You're right.

Just like none of us understood when they all sat with their thumbs up their asses waiting to see how January 6 would shake out. But hey, that is fine. It was because they were waiting for orders from the POTUS or the VPOTUS... that the VPOTUS had a lynch mob and compromised secret service agents hunting down.

But hey, I want me some salmon so Support The Troops God Bless America We Are Number One Make America Great Again, right?

[-] zante@slrpnk.net -4 points 2 weeks ago

Honestly mate I’m I don’t mean to rude, but you haven’t got a clue, have you ?

the Military industrial complex is making bank. The military is fighting Russia on the cheap, without a single soldier lost, and its strangling the Russian economy.

You think anyone is going to interrupt that ? Be allowed to interrupt that ?

[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago

Ah. So they are going to fight to save the economy, not the country.

That is at least somewhat believable. Except... it isn't like we are going to pay them less. And that still involves military officers revolting unless we live in a world where you think Lockheed Martin have secret kill switches in... I don't even know what. The cell phone trump uses to talk to putin?

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Impeaching him might be on the docket, if the Republicans really want Vance in the puppet seat. I think they'd rather manipulate him than whatever fucking impending shit-splosion Trump will become about 3 minutes in.

I think Vance might at least be convinced to do logical things. We know that isn't happening with Donny.

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 weeks ago

I think Vance might at least be convinced to do logical things.

He's more likely to competently implement project 2025. Or at least more competently than Trump.

And that's not a good thing for anyone.

[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I go back and forth on which is more dangerous.

trump is pathologically incapable of not backstabbing everyone around him and people telling him what to do is going to accelerate that. So we might get lucky and go back to the largely ineffectual screaming of the last round rather than focused efforts.

But vance actually has ambitions and might want to be his own person. And vance is REAL stupid.

I think we are horribly fucked either way but I think I am still leaning toward trump surviving until late 2028.

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I firmly believe that Trump will be removed before his term is done. One because Republicans kind of need someone after Trump. But the bigger reason is he is such a narcissist that he is almost certain to step on a few billionaires toes. I think if he accidentally fucks with big money with some short sighted policy he will be swiftly removed.

[-] bamfic@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

I think this is unlikely but is still the most likely way he could be contained or even removed

[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago

Removed by who?

trump controls the military. And as much people think the evil space lizards control the universe, that really isn't the way. And there is zero cahnce that the secret service or even the CIA are going to allow trump to put two in the back of his head and then commit suicide by hanging himself off the roof of the white house.

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

Vance and or the apparatus enabling Trump.

Elon can't take his place... but him, and a few other billionaires can easily put enough pressure for him to be replaced if/when he betrays one of them. Probably because something they were involved with goes bad and he tries to throw them under the bus.

[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago

Again, trump controls the military.

And if they try to get too pushy? Official Act them.

[-] BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

There may exist a scenario where north korea is trying to build something that looks suspiciously like an Ohio class submarine and he has a strange golf bar appear on his desk.

this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2024
435 points (97.2% liked)

News

23367 readers
2383 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS