1067
submitted 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Summary

Historians suggest Democrats might have fared better against Donald Trump by embracing the economic issues championed by Senator Bernie Sanders, who has long pushed for a focus on “bread-and-butter” concerns for working-class voters.

Despite Kamala Harris’s progressive policies, polls showed Trump was favored on economic issues, particularly among working-class and Hispanic voters.

Historian Leah Wright Rigueur argued that Sanders’ messaging on economic struggles could be key for future Democratic strategies.

Sanders himself criticized the party for “abandoning” the working class, which he said has led to a loss of support across racial lines.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 5 days ago

The workers of America need to abandon the Democrat party and establish a unified left wing party (a good name would be "American workers party", yes I know that existed before). A few basic details of this party should include:

  • Primary focus on economic issues
  • The abolition of Capitalism
  • The establishment of worker ran co-ops (aka Syndicates)
  • Minimal government
  • Less taxes
  • Social Programs ran by Syndicates
  • The Abolition of Military (with a small reserve)
  • A fundamental restructuring of policing (with the door open to police abolition)
  • US-First policy, yes it means abandoning its "allies" but America needs to understand that it cannot be the world police forever.
  • And Education reform to ensure that the American people will never end up in this situation again

I wish you the very best of luck. The main issues you'll have will be, in order: funding, funding and funding.

Anyone being serious about this will have to spend most of their time thinking about that. Its why they always, eventually, end up being g captured by the powers that be. But they can do a lot of good before then, in the right circumstances.

One solution is through part of the party being a sort of union of trade unions. Unions have money, similar values and members who would potentially join. Membership subs would be another. They can do an awful lot of good but unions can also come with their own long list of problems you'll have to keep your eye on.

Whatever name you choose, check out the formation of political labour movements, as a kind of road map to building what you want. An example would be the labour party in the UK or NZ. It'll have to be done your way and for an American electorate of course but im sure you won't need any inspiration from me or any other country for that part.

[-] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 days ago

Check out the working class party that started in michigan in 2016.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I guess we'll just have to put up with a couple of months of this fantasizing bullshit, before people realize just how much the paradigm is going to shift... We aren't going to be talking about organizing parties, because it will be moot.

Any real opposition will be removed (imprisoned and/or executed), and anything that remains will be purely for show.

[-] caffinatedone@lemmy.world -1 points 5 days ago

Well, that would be a good way to guarantee republican dominance, yes.

The workers of America will listen to reason if the left has someone strong enough to rally the workers behind them

[-] jmf@lemm.ee 2 points 5 days ago

You underestimate how sensitive the working class is to anything involving removal of capitalism. The red scare never really ended.

Workers are scared of the terminology but not the ideology, if someone who's powerful and charismatic enough is able to clearly explain left wing values the workers will follow along. Workers may be scared but they're also easily convinced.

[-] caffinatedone@lemmy.world -1 points 5 days ago

Wow, there are people who actually believe that in real life? Huh. Good luck with your glorious revolution

Yes leftists exist, not everyone is a liberal

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 5 days ago

I consider myself a leftist (though I'm sure I don't pass the purity tests of many on here), but I'm not deluded enough to believe what you said.

I'm literally in a union position, and I work with college educated people who support Trump.

The purity test here is simple, do you belive in private property (capitalism)?

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

Conventional Democratic Party "wisdom" just accomplished that.

this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2024
1067 points (97.3% liked)

politics

19089 readers
1429 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS