[-] tanja@lemmy.blahaj.zone 34 points 2 months ago

Both.

Both is good.

[-] tanja@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 3 months ago

I like the intention, but I'm worried about the advice near the end

Learn to see things that aren't "leftist" as radical.

I.e. a whole bunch of settle for less

I want leftist spaces, groups, what have you without tankies, not community centers who dislike the current government.

Am I missing something? I'm new to this ๐Ÿฅบ

[-] tanja@lemmy.blahaj.zone 81 points 4 months ago

There are GPU-locked apps?

Wtf

[-] tanja@lemmy.blahaj.zone 67 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Your explanation works very well, but completely falls apart in the last paragraph.

Solar power production clearly is (at least in part) a post-scarsity scenario, given we literally have too much power on the grid.

Furthermore, calling the power market anything like "free" is just plain wrong. A liberal approach to market regulation here would have led to disaster a long time ago, for the reasons you described at the beginning of your comment.

The market "works" because of, not inspite of regulation.

And negative prices are a good thing for consumers, not market failure.

[-] tanja@lemmy.blahaj.zone 153 points 5 months ago

Nice

Good to see one of the two big packaging hubs do something against malware

11
submitted 5 months ago by tanja@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
[-] tanja@lemmy.blahaj.zone 31 points 6 months ago

No nooooo cyclist bad ๐Ÿ˜”๐Ÿ˜ฟ๐Ÿ˜”

Just one more lane pls ๐Ÿฅบ๐Ÿ‘‰๐Ÿ‘ˆ

Car-brain go brrrr

[-] tanja@lemmy.blahaj.zone 79 points 6 months ago

NixOS mentioned ๐Ÿ‘€๐Ÿ‘€๐Ÿ‘€โ„๏ธ

30

Hey there ๐Ÿ‘‹

I'm looking for filament recommendations (preferably PLA) which glows in the dark, specifically, the ones which glow the brightest/the longest.

I.e. the GITD filament with the most particles (I think)?

Any recommendations?

[-] tanja@lemmy.blahaj.zone 46 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Ain't no one getting excited about any kind of capitalism any more ๐Ÿคฎ๐Ÿคข

[-] tanja@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 7 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I don't think they're allowed to do these fake loading screens in the EU

PS: in the settings of uBlock Origin, you can select a cookie banner blocker. This gets rid of 99.99% of cookie banners โœจ (there're also options against newsletter boxes).
9 of 10 hacker kittens recommend this ๐ŸŒธ๐Ÿ˜ธ

[-] tanja@lemmy.blahaj.zone 38 points 7 months ago

It simply makes no sense that it only blocks Chinese citizens specifically.

I don't want anyone to buy/own housing which goes uninhabited for a long time while there are so many homeless people who need a place to call home.

It's difficult to imagine a person struggling to buy/rent an apartment/house, and for them to get mad about nationalities, rather than the fact that housing needs to be an "investment opportunity" over being recognized as the basic human need that it really is.

I hardly care if it's Chinese people, Wallstreet, some Big Tech corporation, or just individual landlords driving up prices.

Housing must be accessible to all people, if a society wants to call itself civilized.

This bill going against Chinese citizens, rather than all foreigners tells you all you need to know about the real motivations behind it.

[-] tanja@lemmy.blahaj.zone 61 points 10 months ago

Honestly, as long as you're not going for a clickbait-like thing with lots of ๐Ÿ˜‚, ๐Ÿ˜ญ, and ๐Ÿ’€, when is not really justified, I don't really see an issue.

Personally I'll use โœจ, โ˜บ๏ธ, ๐ŸŒธ, and ๐Ÿฅบ regularly in my comments as I think they're cute ๐Ÿฅบโœจ

[-] tanja@lemmy.blahaj.zone 95 points 10 months ago

Rather disappointing.

I'd be in favor of a law requiring the labeling of such products, but this seems to overreach; especially when applied to animal feed.

86
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by tanja@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/linux@lemmy.ml

So I've recently taken an interest in these three distros:

All of these offer something very interesting:
Access to (basically) all Linux-capable software, no matter from what repo.

Both NixOS and blendOS are based on config files, from which your system is basically derived from, and Vanilla OS uses a package manager apx to install from any given repo, regardless of distribution.

While I've looked into Fedora Silverblue, that distro is limited to only install Flatpaks (edit: no, not really), which is fine for "apps", but seems to be more of a problem with managing system- and CLI tools.

I haven't distro hopped yet, as I'm still on Manjaro GNOME on my devices.


What are your thoughts on the three distros mentioned above?
Which ones are the most interesting, and for what reasons?

Personally, I'm mostly interested in NixOS & blendOS, as I believe they may have more advantages compared to Arch;

What do you think?

3
rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
view more: next โ€บ

tanja

joined 1 year ago