[-] corvus@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

Great, thank you!

[-] corvus@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

Awesome, thanks!

[-] corvus@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

Yeah, that's exactly the problem, thanks for the better wording.

[-] corvus@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago

It's mini PC that I manage to have it working only with FOSS, even the bluetooth, but it's a dongle with Bluetooth version 1.1 and I want to upgrade but keeping the system with FOSS.

[-] corvus@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago

It's a mini PC, no PCI or m.2 extension, it's connected to the internet through cable, but I also have WiFi dongle and a Bluetooth dongle that don't require proprietary firmware, but the Bluetooth version is only 1.1 which its limitations and I want to upgrade.

[-] corvus@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago

I'm already using one that doesn't require proprietary firmware, but it's Bluetooth version 1.1 which it has its limitations

51
submitted 2 days ago by corvus@lemmy.ml to c/opensource@lemmy.ml

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/21430107

I'm having trouble to find a bluetooth dongle at least 3.0 that needs no propietary firmware. It's easy to find dongles advertised as linux compatible or users that claim that an specific brand works fine in linux, but the problem is that many of them are using propietary firmware without their users being aware because their distributions have already installed propietary drivers or firmwares, or ask users to install them and they just do it. I use debian main repository (without non-free software) in which I failed to make work a couple of linux compatible advertised dongles because debian ask me to install a propietary firmware. So if anyone knows for certain that some brand that needs no such a software in linux I'll apreciate your help.

50
submitted 2 days ago by corvus@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml

I'm having trouble to find a bluetooth dongle at least 3.0 that needs no propietary firmware. It's easy to find dongles advertised as linux compatible or users that claim that an specific brand works fine in linux, but the problem is that many of them are using propietary firmware without their users being aware because their distributions have already installed propietary drivers or firmwares, or ask users to install them and they just do it. I use debian main repository (without non-free software) in which I failed to make work a couple of linux compatible advertised dongles because debian ask me to install a propietary firmware. So if anyone knows for certain that some brand that needs no such a software in linux I'll apreciate your help.

149
submitted 1 month ago by corvus@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

During the past few years I was avoiding the increasing number of products or services that required biometric verification, specially face recognition (FR). But the things are getting harder are harder in my country:

  • The largest e-commerce platform in latin america and the most used in my country requires FR to use it. It was possible to use cash if you buy from its website but since a couple of weeks it's requesting me to identify using it's app.
  • The telecoms demands FR from now on if you want a new SIM card in case you lost your phone or it's been stolen.
  • The bank is now pressing me to use their app with FR as a 2fa when using homebanking from its website, something that wasn't necessary up to some weeks ago.
  • The government is in the same direction as it's moving to digitalizing many burocratic procedures and also requires FR.

and the list is increasing quickly.

I've never used any private social networks and I've degoogled many years ago, the only non free software that I use is Whatsapp because in some countries in latin america is almost imposible not to use it, you need it even to call to the car towing service.

Anybody that is well informed knows the dangers of allowing such an amount of private information now tied to our face be available for hackers now equiped with AI, but frankly it seems a lost cause to fight against something that 99.9% of people dont worry about and give consent to do so to corporations (that sell all your data to whoever wants it) and governments (who use it as a tool of control).

I don't know, may be I'm also worring to much and it's not that serious, after all if tens of millions of people do the same the chances of being targeted by hackers is not different of being robbed in the street (at least in latin america) and with the obiquitous surveillance cameras plus the almost unavoidable need of a phone, the government probably know exactly where you are and how you look, so the information may be already available. Perhaps it's time to give up and adapt to the world we now live in.

[-] corvus@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 month ago
[-] corvus@lemmy.ml 43 points 1 month ago

How many years until they run out of characters?

1059
Fastest animal (lemmy.ml)
submitted 2 months ago by corvus@lemmy.ml to c/science_memes@mander.xyz
-20
submitted 3 months ago by corvus@lemmy.ml to c/opensource@lemmy.ml

An enlightening and high quality video on how money and the banking system work, why they are corrupted and what is the solution.

532
submitted 3 months ago by corvus@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
710
science hell (fedia.io)
submitted 7 months ago by corvus@lemmy.ml to c/science_memes@mander.xyz
[-] corvus@lemmy.ml 25 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

It refers to the ability to locate the source of a sound. It supposes that the localization is achieved only by the difference of the time of arrival of the sound to both ears. That's why the curve is a hyperbola, which is the set of points which distances to the foci (ears) have the same difference, so you couldn't differentiate which of all the points in the hyperbola is the actual source (confusion). But this is too simplistic, the auditory system is much more sophisticated and the source can be localized by other means.

Sound Localization

[-] corvus@lemmy.ml 33 points 7 months ago

It's totally doable because they are real people.

[-] corvus@lemmy.ml 49 points 7 months ago

Unbeatable running multiple threads

133
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by corvus@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

A cool software for degooglers that makes a little noise every time your computer sends a packet to a tracker or Google service.

EDIT: There is also a Firefox add-on for web browsing.

[-] corvus@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 year ago

It's not unusual to see people talking about android users being Linux users "because android is Linux too" clearly not understanding the difference between Linux the OS, i.e. GNU/Linux, and Linux the kernel. So it's useful when you have to make such a distinction.

view more: next ›

corvus

joined 1 year ago