A compiler doesn't have to make the exact same output, nor does an LLM have to make differing outputs, and a compiler uses someone else's code to transform your code into something else.

At least they use your data to make a model that's open weight

Good, maybe people will stop using it and switch to an open-weight Chinese model

https://nitter.net/realUpScrolled/status/2022787667654537686#m

And then they immediately got a surge of new users, well played Google

Engaging algorithms is the reason people stay on proprietary services. Fediverse users love to shoot themselves in the foot talking about how algorithms and AI sucks then wonder why people don't want to switch

Engaging algorithm, no paywall, funding or monetization strategy, viewpoint diversity, and a large amount of people already using it

https://reuse.software/faq/#uncopyrightable

The REUSE specification recommends claiming copyright even if it's machine generated. Is this incorrect information?

EDIT: Also, how is copyrighting code from an AI different than copyrighting an output from a compiler?

Draconian punishments and inflicting suffering and death has no place in a functioning society.

Yes, that's why Trump should get the death penalty

There's a billion other reasons Trump deserves the death penalty including committing multiple genocides.

I went on Gab recently to see what the reaction was regarding the Epstein files, and calls for Trump to be executed was not what I was expecting. And r/conservative doesn't give a shit but thinks Trump is an idiot for other reasons. Also seeing an influx of people who previously supported Trump but are stepping back after the ICE shooting and constitutional violations. So not sure who likes him at this point; he might actually manage to beat Biden in being unpopular.

So does Wikipedia

No you aren't missing anything, the UX is actually that dumb