-68
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago

This account was created fifty-three days ago and in that time has made four thousand two hundred and eighty-five submissions to Lemmy.

That averages out to one every seventeen minutes and forty-nine seconds, seven days a week twenty-four hours a day.

[-] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 month ago

They've also changed display names a minimum of 6 times in that time frame. I wonder why.

[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

I haven't looked lately, but the posts/comments come more frequently than that because they come in 16 hour spurts. The last time I looked anyway, the user made a point of taking an ~8 hour break our of every 24. After all a single human poster could not post around the clock for two months straight, mods would ban the account.

From the newsweek article, https://lemmy.world/post/20361519 , it seems that's her intention. This isn't as overt as joining the GOP campaign (like RFK Jr did) but it's getting very close there. It's at the point where it's impossible to see Stein as anything but a pro GOP vote now... ironic considering that the Greens were originally more left than the Dems. Sad to see now how low things have fallen...

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago

MSN.com - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for MSN.com:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/jill-stein-blew-it-for-hillary-clinton-will-she-do-the-same-for-kamala-harris-opinion/ar-AA1rszcS?ocid=BingNewsVerp
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2024
-68 points (11.4% liked)

politics

19096 readers
2780 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS