27
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ftbd@feddit.org 7 points 3 months ago

FYI for those using DNS-based adblocking: I discovered that my AndroidTV box asks 8.8.8.8 when my local DNS server blocks a request.

[-] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

I always have issues with dns blocking so I tried something sneaky I redirected all DNS requests to 1.1.1.1/1.0.0.1 and it worked brilliantly, for about a month when it stopped working all together, I don’t know if a cache was wiped or google saw what I was doing and made a special exception just for me, obviously I want to believe I’m a special snowflake taking the world’s largest internet company head on in an epic battle of wits and skill but I think the cache thing might be more likely for some reason.

[-] ftbd@feddit.org 1 points 3 months ago

You mean redirecting on your router? How should google stop you from doing that? And why would you redirect to cloudflare lol

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

Dang, so you'd have to block Google's DNS at the router level too?

[-] addie@feddit.uk 1 points 3 months ago

What a shower of twats. Don't block the request in that case, just redirect it to your local server that returns a 1x1 transparent png for all requests.

[-] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Block all port 53 traffic from your network outside of your DNS server/pihole itself.
Block all known DoH servers.

If you want to get REALLY fancy you can write a NAT rule that will force any outgoing request on port 53 to route to your dns/pihole.

I do all of this. It's actually funny to see the requests that were hardcoded to go somewhere. Giant fuck you to those companies.

[-] Goun@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

Do DoH requests go though 443?

[-] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 1 points 3 months ago

Yes. But there are lists of well known IPs that are serving DoH. So you can just block those. Obviously blocking 443 is not a good idea.

[-] Goun@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

Damn, never digged into that I thought blocking the DNS port would be enough, thanks for the information.

[-] wrekone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 months ago

Depending on your router you can forward all request on port 53 to your DNS server regardless of the IP they try to use.

[-] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

An ad giant already owns and controls my current TV’s OS

[-] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago
[-] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Look into Sceptre. 4K with no OS, no ads, doesn't ask for WiFi - just a TV.

[-] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago

It’s hard but not impossible, as even ‘retail displays’ run an OS in the background to control input switching, image settings etc.

Honestly the best thing to do is buy whatever TV you want (we have a couple of the LG OLEDs in our household), and don’t ever plug them into your network (or WiFi). Otherwise, with updates OS and apps become sluggish, with more ads crammed in.

Instead, use a seperate media player (e.g. Apple TV if you’re already on the iOS ecosystem, Nvidia Shield or similar for Android, HTPC if you’re so inclined etc.) - they’re more powerful, arguably more secure & private, and portable between displays if/when you upgrade.

[-] coolmojo@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Unfortunately EtherNet over HDMI exists so your your TV can still access the Internet if the Apple TV or Nvidia Shield has Internet access. To prevent that you have to make sure use older HDMI cable less then HDMI 1.4.

[-] stooth64@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

I didn’t think any devices even adopted Ethernet over HDMI

[-] Majestic@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago

Never been implemented. It doesn’t exist.

Cables support it but zero devices made it to the consumer market and both devices would need to support it for it to work. It’s a dead standard from another era at this point. WiFi speeds have become so significant that there’s just no reason for the additional costs that would be involved.

I admit if half of the people out there who bought smart TVs started refusing to connect them to the internet and bought streaming boxes instead there might be an incentive for TV makers to try it but no incentive for streaming devices to help them do it and at that point it’s just easier for TV makers to require an internet connection or the TV doesn’t work.

[-] coolmojo@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Thank you for the clarification. I was not aware of this.

[-] Petter1@lemm.ee 5 points 3 months ago

I don’t want an OS on my next TV…

[-] MrSoup@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 months ago

Ehm, it is already like that. Most of smart TVs use Android which is under Google control, a big (if not the biggest) ad company.

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

"A convicted felon and sex offender wants to control your next country"

[-] nshibj@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

What's with the clickbait title?

This is not news, it has been happening since Smart TVs started being a thing.

One of the most common TV OSs is AndroidTV / GoogleTV. Google is the biggest ad company in the world.

[-] BroBot9000@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Don’t ever connect them to the internet. Period.

If it’s required, buy a different tv. It’s not difficult to look that up beforehand.

[-] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

I suspect in the near future it will be impossible to buy a TV without spyware/adware. The only option will be to not connect it to the internet and run your own Raspberry PI/SBC based solution.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] madjo@feddit.nl 2 points 3 months ago

What’s a TV? Is that like a monitor?

[-] random_character_a@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

My current TV is clawing my firewall like squirrel with rabies. I'm sure the next one will too.

[-] Petter1@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

I just give smartTVs no network at all

[-] 0x0@programming.dev 1 points 3 months ago

Please enable internet access to setup your new TV, otherwise no TV for you.

[-] teft@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Then you turn around and return it. Don’t encourage that behavior by just letting it happen.

[-] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

If your retailer has a generous enough policy to let you return an opened TV because simply because you don’t like it. I spent $1,200 on a Sony TV with backlight bleed issues that were so bad that half the screen was tinted blue. I tried to return it or get a replacement but was told by both the retailer and Sony support that half the screen being blue was “normal for LED TVs and within acceptable parameters” and to go fuck myself.

[-] teft@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

That’s what chargebacks are for. You don’t have to rely on shitty retailers return policy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] qyron@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 months ago
[-] DampCanary@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

unfortunately,
on some markets they are gone.
"Smart" TVs have squeezed them out.

[-] billwashere@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

You can find them. Look for digital signage. And then start crying at the cost.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Goun@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

Good luck with that

[-] stephen01king@lemmy.zip 0 points 3 months ago

Is there a reason to go for a dumb TV as opposed to just not connecting your smart TV to wifi?

[-] qyron@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 months ago

People smarter than me have already had that discussion in the thread and after some heated arguments the consensus is that smart TVs have been caught actively searching for same manufacturer hardware and open wi-fi networks to access the web and call home.

So...

[-] francisfordpoopola@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago
[-] JDPoZ@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Not good enough. Any OTA updates your TV can get over the web will eventually be trying to circumvent your IP blacklists to shove in any ad-riddled garbage they can.

Literally just blacklist your TV’s MAC address, and use a dedicated set top box of some kind to avoid this shit. My current choice is my NVIDIA Shield Pro 2019, which I installed a 3rd party WOLF launcher (there’s also F-Launcher) and turned off auto-updates so I could avoid NVIDIA and Google doing the same.

At some point, I will probably need to switch to a NUC or other HTPC with some flavor of Linux on it, as eventually the Shield may succumb to this shit as well.

[-] GhiLA@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

normal people can't just.... grab a single board PC and... install Linux on it! What are they supposed to do!?

I dunno, suffer, I guess. Pass the keyboard. I'm feeling Friends.

edit: my cousin and his wife came over about four months ago and saw we used a keyboard and the TV was just a computer and he went "why the fuck haven't we just done that?". He doesn't know know Linux, but he has a Steam Deck and got by alright.

Sometimes, they just need the idea, a little push.

[-] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

Smart TVs are why I'm never getting rid of the old Samsung TV I'm currently using as a monitor for my desktop. It's not quite flat screen like an actual flat screen, but at least it doesn't have a camera attached to it (besides the USB camera I keep unplugged unless needed), no microphone, and no ads. Plus, I still have access to all the other types of things I need like AVI and coaxial inputs, besides HDMI. It's gonna be the saddest day ever when the beauty decides to die on me.

[-] Deceptichum@quokk.au 1 points 3 months ago

Googles been a TV OS for a while now.

[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

So stupid! Everyone knows if you want people to see your company's logo, you gotta put it on the back of the cereal box, at the bottom of the cereal bowl or on the front and back of the poon! The spoon is literally observed by every single human on every bite....here come the rice crispiest!...jeep! I gotta get me a jeep! Look! It's on my spoon!

[-] 0x0@programming.dev 0 points 3 months ago

Now all you need is a built-in camera to prove Orwell was right... only off by a few decades, really.

[-] ben_dover@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

phones and laptops got that covered

[-] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago

I have an old 60 inch 1080p TV from the early days of smart tvs. It has a built in app for plex and youtube, a remote that works as a pointer, it's insanely slow but it has zero ads and I'm never ever getting a newer model.

[-] ramble81@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024
27 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

63023 readers
662 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS