What is a woman?
Is this a woman?
This might have too many rights to be a woman.
They definitely give this way more power than they would any woman.
A woman is clearly the opposite of man so thusly I propose that a woman is a feathered quadruped.
Why must she have four? Why can she not have six, eight, or a hundred?
Because that's too many. It's icky. As the old saying goes, "Two legs, I'm down. Four legs, I'll come around. Five or more, I'm leaving town."
dude you just gotta learn how to love a long lots of legged lady. a biblically accurate runner.
We're going to need to see what's in it's panties!
if you're stupid enough to believe this... you're stupid enough to be a Republican.
Where are my pantyhose! I'm going to war!
Are you ready to go yet?
Hang on, I'm almost finished putting my 16 fingers on!
Ohh sexy war.
"We need more heels on the ground!"
Believing is one thing, but in what world do you join the army or support terrorism because there is some hot chick there?
Every us navy boat has a hot chick room what do you mean
For a lot of folks, sadly, this one.
So maybe it's because my brain is currently fried from overheating and just getting done with work, but is it just me are the proportions off? Like the head is too big for the body, probably miss matched training data.
It looks like a bad photoshop, the lighting doesn't match and she is at a different resolution than the background
For me it's the skirt and pole that make no sense
Any MAGA who fell for this is beyond stupid (plus utterly unfamiliar with the military). Her uniform is wrong (skirt WAYYY too high). No one wears dress uniforms underway at sea in general, ESPECIALLY an enlisted soldier (who would likely be nowhere near a ship, even more especially in dress uniform). The ribbons on her dress uniform not only change from picture to picture, but are also the wrong size (sometimes) and not even actual US ribbons. I've never seen a regulation name tag say "US ARMY" and not a name. The undershirt in her camis isn't regulation. And this was just a quick look at the photos and only tangentially around the Army at work.
Oh and that's before the visible glitches because it's AI. This is laughably low effort.
EDIT: Damn, they didn't even use a real ship as the background. It's supposed to be a destroyer, and there are no US destroyers with an aft-facing bridge or part of the superstructure forward of the bridge windows. Just truly WTF
EDIT 2.0: I just saw a couple other photos because I got curious. One has her as a one-star general 😂, and a couple others have her wearing a (shitty looking) Combat Infantry Badge, which is only awarded for being in combat. So, I guess women CAN hack it in combat! Hegseth must be in shambles.
She's hot and it's pro-Trump. Why should they care if it's real or not if it tickles their...confirmation bias?
Even without the technical knowledge of military uniforms, one look at any of these and my mind is just screaming "probably fake".
IDK why exactly.
I think it's mostly that she's so young and beautiful and doesn't have that vapid dead-behind-the-eyes look that most MAGA women do. She looks like a happy vivacious young woman, not like a highly decorated military officer.
IDK how to say this but if women like her actually existed we would already be overrun with real photos of them in the oval office.
The other red flags that don't require technical knowledge that trip the "probably fake" alert buzzer:
Who takes a selfie with POTUS in the oval office?
Why is she wearing a crop top that looks like it's from cost-co?
Why is she standing around on a ship in high heels looking serious?
Why is she walking around on a military base with Trump without the usual entourage?
How many of the accounts that followed this one were actually bot/“AI” accounts designed to do nothing but help boost shit like this to a place where the press reports on it?
LOL, "America First agenda".
Just what the holy fuck does that even mean according these dumbasses? Because Donvict and his pals are all about America LAST and themselves first.
The pic of her in a vehicle with her bare feet sticking out the window appeared to show her with three boobs under her shirt, her right side boob having it's own seeming cleavage.
Without seeking it out, I've seen 2 versions of the referenced image: that one, and one with 2 boobs. Hopefully they were fooled by the lesser alien-looking one...
...lesser ~~alien~~-looking one...
Mutant. They prefer to be called mutants.
Does it really matter? These people were detached from reality long before AI was a thing. These are the people who swallowed horse dewormer to fight off a virus, stormed the capitol to hang their own party's VP over election fraud that never happened (but that they are now actively preparing themselves), and attacked a pizzeria to save children from the clutches of pedophiles (all the while ignoring their idol's ties to, and probably involvement with the crimes of, pedophile child trafficker Epstein).
We must come to grips with the fact that a significant part of the U.S. population is living in an alternative, media-generated universe. Baudrillard would be laughing his arse off if he could see it. The question is: how to deal with that.
It seems you've thought deeply about this. I've done so as well.
It really fucking freaks me out that such a large chunk of our society is detached from objective, verifiable realty. A fair amount of what they believe is pants-on-head crazy vengeance fantasy. Another big chunk has spooky parallels to literal Nazi propaganda such as the Protocol of the Elders of Zion, it's so similar that it's obviously just borrowed. It's shocking that more people don't see it for what it transparently is.
I have no clue what can be done about it. I don't know how society heals this or reinforces the value of facts, sanity, and critical thinking.
You got anything? Any thoughts about where we go from here? How to unfuck their heads? Where does this end if they aren't deprogrammed? How long will we be trapped in this?
Genuine questions because I ain't got a fucking clue at this point.
I think it is a fight on all fronts situation.
If I am picking a single issue I am picking transparency. Without it you don't have a democracy.
I push for more ranked voting, there are a few types that all seem fine.
Illinois just had a plurality wins primary, that's crazy to me.
I found a thing I was looking for, referred from activistchecklist.org
"You’re three people who’ve held #meetings, made decisions, navigated disagreement, migrated platforms, and built a #SetOfAgreements you wrote yourselves. That’s not common."
Sometimes I really wish I had the time and energy to get in on this grift. These dumbfucks are the easiest people on the planet to rob. I just need a truckload full of shitty, Chinese made MAGA merch and a stand at some county fair, and I’d be fucking rich. Unfortunately, I have no desire whatsoever to be associated in any way with these fascist shit stains. The money is just not worth having that stench rub off on me.
"We can always tell" motherfuckers
“wHaT iS a WoMaN?” Not goddamn pixels, that’s for sure.
These MAGA freaks are just perfectly positioned to be scammed with AI, aren't they? Blind patriotism/nationalism, easy to manufacture images of the stereotypical people they hate, rejection of science and facts, unshakable loyalty to the Pedophile-In-Chief, zero critical thinking skills, intense tribalism, single echo-chamber source of "news", love for a pretty, white face, low intelligence, etc. I know some of them have already fallen for scams, but I bet it's nothing like what we'll see in the future, most likely by other Republicans...
That shit loaf in trumps pants isnt ai
They didn't even register the triple boob, a news article will not inform them.
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News