That's the best thing about the stuff that the CIA has done: they publicly admit to it in writing and people still refuse to believe it's true
Linux user, still tweaking colors and theme options in their DE after 4 years: Let me finish setting up my device!
switch to gnome; customizations are intentionally buried because a huge majority of users don't go very deep w with them.
So, no laws for the rich
the only surprising thing about this is that not everyone already knew this.
it's not snark or sarcasm: this is true more often than not and i guess people really don't like paying attention.
plane antisemitic. lol
love the black eye on the camera man. lol
the goal is to bankrupt the organization as much as possible and he's using the legal system to do so; if the organization doesn't respond, he automatically wins in this legal system, so they must spend $$$ on lawyers to fight the lawsuit.
The Fediverse is undeniably very left leaning currently, which is surprising to me since you’d think the anti-censorship design on paper would appeal more to people on the right who are against big tech and censorship, but I guess not? It’s interesting.
american conservatives care more about denying rights and liberties than anything else as evidenced by their leaders and publicly shared platforms; so if you believe that censorship has anything to do w it, you're not a conservative.
then don't buy locked phones; that's the exact reason why they're locked.
very based. the porn in the entire fediverse is straight and/or vanilla and any google search will give you better content.
i wish i could feel the same way op has posted
we have that same nuance here in the united states and it's be shown that the judge's approval is nothing more than a rubber stamp.
12 years for me and i'm kicking myself for letting myself get so entrenched after i had experienced the same thing before; fediverse, here i come! lol
yes please! lol
but i wonder how this would work with men and women; do they take turns with the man? if so how is it different than 1-on-1 porn?