180
submitted 1 month ago by KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml to c/firefox@lemmy.ml
(page 2) 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] obbeel@lemmy.eco.br 4 points 1 month ago

What wouldn't I be able to access without compatibility investments? Spotify, LinkedIn? I think I'm fine.

Besides, what's the point of OSS that is owned 85% by a big company?

[-] kalkulat@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Linux Mint puts out a great OS for a few thousand per month. With the start it's got, Firefox could go on for decades without more income.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago

Open source aint going anywheres, no worries here

[-] KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago

Browser codebase is really complex and requires dedicated dev effort.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] FriendBesto@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 month ago

I fail to see how this is new news, we have known this for years now, no?

I looked at their finances --which anyone can do-- and even if Google were to remove their funding tomorrow, Mozilla still has about 2-3 years of reserve capital they can burn through. Not optimal but it is not like they will disappear in a year.

Clearly, not a position they would want to be in, but they are not disappearing overnight.

[-] slacktoid@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 month ago

Jeez why are mozilla execs the dumbest people in the fucking room! Next they will say the earth is a spheroid.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 02 May 2025
180 points (95.5% liked)

Firefox

20125 readers
36 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS