154
all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Wazowski@lemmy.world 49 points 1 week ago

This sounds like a positive development, the incompetence will slow him down. The fuckwits will be stumbling over one another. Short of mass suicide, I’m not sure what better a result we could hope for.

[-] resipsaloquitur@lemm.ee 37 points 1 week ago

Right-wingers with better aim?

[-] mjhelto@lemm.ee 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Jack Black would be very cross with you if he was here!

[-] resipsaloquitur@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago

We aren’t lifelong friends, so no need for him to throw me under the bus to protect his Minecraft Movie payday.

[-] DrFistington@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

It will also remove any worries about accidentally harming innocents when a mob storms the white house and rips them all apart

[-] distantsounds@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

It is not a positive development. Thoughts & prayers aren’t going to save a thing.

[-] KingGordon@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago

Four Seasons Total Landscaping.

[-] saigot@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 week ago
[-] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

That would be in line with both the headline and his role model from the 1940s with the moustache.

[-] nightwatch_admin@feddit.nl 1 points 1 week ago

He does that regularly, just too bad he doesn’t change his diaper just as often.

[-] ScrambledEggs@lazysoci.al 24 points 1 week ago

"Shock and horror" is more like it. I'm assuming he will replace people that don't fall in line with more white supremacy, boot licking, pig fuckers.

[-] match@pawb.social 1 points 1 week ago

shock and awful

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

Get rid of people who actually know how to do things and replace them with his own tools.

[-] jacksilver@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

To be honest I assumed most Whitehouse staff are political appointees. If that's the case he's looking to fire all the incompetent people he brought on himself. But some may be apolitical.

[-] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

The article says “starting with mid-level staff” and they clearly don’t know how to do things. If they mean White House literally, low-level staff are probably the only people who do know how to do things right now. I doubt the kitchen workers, cleaning staff, tour guides, etc. are even people to Trump. Even the chef/kitchen staff just probably has to handle state dinners and other events but most days, just make a McDonald’s run or burn a steak.

[-] msprout@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

God, what the fuck else is new? That has been every day since January, man.

[-] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago

kakistocracy

Noun

kakistocracy (plural kakistocracies)

  1. (political scienceGovernment under the control of a nation's worst or least-qualified citizens. [from 1829.]
[-] nightwatch_admin@feddit.nl 4 points 1 week ago

Great word. FWIW “kakken” is a Dutch word for defecating. It’s not as crude as “schijten”, maybe more like “to (take a) crap”.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 10 points 1 week ago

The article leads with that headline, but quickly piviots to talking about Mike Waltz being tossed in a place Trump doesn't care about.

That said, if it happens, I'll laugh my ass off as they fire everyone who knows how to do the real work.

[-] mdd@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

Didn't this happen yesterday?

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

How many times does this guy have to fill a swamp before his followers realizing there wasn't anything to drain until he showed up?

[-] Impound4017@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago

I mean… there was and is plenty of swamp to drain, it’s just that Trump was never actually gonna do it. Legalized corruption is part of why we’re in this mess.

[-] Astrophage@lemy.lol 3 points 1 week ago

Just remember, it's not for Project 2025, whatever that is, even though the authors are great buddies of his. /s

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Before you go, mix a laxative into the sugar for the coffee.

[-] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I mean, would he even notice? I'm not so sure that he has reliable bowel control on a good day...

[-] lupusblackfur@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The plan reportedly involves firing staff in a massive wave rather than doing it piecemeal, starting with mid-level White House staffers.

Pfft...

Sounds like just purging "staff" same as getting rid of "staff" across government entities like they've been doing.

Just getting more "roadblocks" out of their way.

No reference to cabinet personnel... (other that the mention of Walz' "re-assignment".) 🤷‍♂️ 🤡

[-] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

Purges! The cornestone of every ludicrous dictator! (A nod here to the classic Pulp Fiction line)

[-] slickgoat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Rinse and repeat every 100 days.

[-] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

The only ones left will be Russian and Chinese moles.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago
this post was submitted on 02 May 2025
154 points (98.1% liked)

politics

23459 readers
1455 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS