How to do voting even is a big question. The really representative systems tend to end up with razor thin coalitions full of smallish parties that play brinkmanship. There's got to be a way to discourage that, but I don't know what it is yet.

More controversially, it should probably address economic inequality in some way.

Let the robots be in charge. They can't do any worse.

Land value tax, election by sortition for the legislative branch, bodily autonomy

Does everyone have to like it or do I just get to pick one and everyone has to live with it? If the latter, I might give technocracy a try…

Any form of political corruption should be severly punished.

Any political office should have a limit of two terms.

• sovereignty, and the necessary respect for mutual sovereignty, are the cornerstone of law
• government may have absolute authority over is own services, but may not determine what services a citizen subscribes to
• a decent portion of taxes must be self-directed
• taxes apply equally to all valid legal entities
• all legal entities receive UBI from those taxes
• the only act of compulsion permissible by the government is to reduce compulsion, and may only be applied to the compelling party.
• contribution of time, energy, effort, and attention may not be compelled
• isolation may not be denied
• strict separation of church and state
• strict separation of government and bon-government financial interests
• government pay is proportional to average income

Remember, no English

Actual human rights

Our Constitution as it is is pretty good, so wisdom would be to tread lightly. I think the only change I would make is to prohibit primary elections. That would be considered a right, as in, no person or group may deny a candidate with sufficient signatures the right to appear on the ballot. I would also mandate some sort of ranked choice voting or instant runoff election. These two changes would be to fix the problem of having to vote against a bad guy rather than voting for a good guy. It far too often ends with the second worst candidate who goes into the primary, coming out victorious. We should be electing the best, not the second worst.