235
top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] bungalowtill@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 days ago

Anybody noticed what a mess this article is? Is there so much plastic in our brains already that we discuss our dystopian future in those idiotic terms?

[-] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 43 points 1 week ago

next up: why aren't millenials and zoomers having kids? probably because of avocado toast and pronoun.

[-] Ioughttamow@fedia.io 38 points 1 week ago

Oh thank goodness, my youngest was born a year ago

[-] puppycat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 1 week ago

mine was born yesterday, phew! imagine if they were born a day later!

[-] Yondoza@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

Congratulations (if this isn't a joke)!!! I'd love to help make the world habitable for your child.

[-] puppycat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 week ago

no I'm never having kids

unless the world somehow fixes itself and somehow guarantees it'll stay that way for more than a few seconds.

[-] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago

Start by going vegan and catching public transport. Thirdly, don't have kids.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

Putting that third understates it, having kids is the worst thing a person can do

[-] The_Terrible_Humbaba@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That is a really skewed stat. Having kids is only the worse thing a person can do, because of the average person's lifestyle (and therefore that kid's future lifestyle). How many cows are born each year (and release methane gasses into the atmosphere) just because the average person won't go without meat or milk?

If the average person didn't drive and was vegan, then the impact of having kids would be severely reduced.

EDIT: Put it this way, what do you think would be the environmental impact of a hermit dude living in the mountains who grows his own plant food? It might be an extreme example, but the point is illustrated.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

You’re putting somebody else through a life they deserve better than

[-] The_Terrible_Humbaba@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That's an entirely separate discussion, I'm just talking about the environmental impact of having kids. The impact of having a kid is just the impact they will have as a person.

[-] Letstakealook@lemm.ee 19 points 1 week ago

This has been clear for at least 20 years to anybody paying attention. I feel for those who will have to suffer this fate they didn't cause nor ask for.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago

In the 2000s they warned us the 2020s would be like this

They also said the 2050s would be apocalyptic

[-] Letstakealook@lemm.ee 9 points 1 week ago

The craziest part is that things have blown past the worst scenario models, and many are still asleep. Or even worse, think some magical, undiscovered technology will save everyone. The outlook is pretty grim for anyone still around during the second half of the century.

[-] veganpizza69@lemmy.vg 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Those 2050s are going to be coming sooner than expected.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

We planted trees as kids in the 80s. Didn't just plant them either. We kept going back every year to check on the trees. We made sure that 10 trees for every kid in our school made it to 5 years before we stopped replanting that tree. Over the years I must have planted at least 50-100 trees. I wish it felt like it did anything.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

I did similar though we didn’t check them ourselves

[-] veganpizza69@lemmy.vg 15 points 1 week ago

The current adult generations don't comprehend that they're sacrificing the children' future (and thus, the children) in order to maintain their Business As Usual lifestyle and dreams of being rich. It's all "what about me tho?", "it's someone else's problem", "it wasn't me!" All of this is very easy to do. It's like stealing ~~candy~~ potable water from a baby.

[-] deaf_fish@lemm.ee 8 points 1 week ago

Well, the numbers are in and it looks like capitalism will be killing us all.

[-] hex_m_hell@slrpnk.net 1 points 6 days ago

It will not, but it will destroy everything it built and make capitalism impossible.

[-] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Doesn't matter, the dominionists will blame it on trans people, gays, atheists, feminists, etc., and we will have to repent our sins to stop the second flood or whatever they will call the climate collapse.

[-] 1984@lemmy.today -5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Nobody knows the future, least of all some "study".

New people will be born, new technology will exist, new goals will be set.

I also think we are moving towards a bad future with no freedom and lots of censorship, with Ai, robots and implants, probably also world government and corruption.

I dont think the weather is going to be our worst problem. Its going to be ourselves.

[-] Genius@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 week ago

The weather is going to be our worst problem in 50 years.

[-] andymouse@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago

I suppose our second worst problem will be ourselves, reacting in our various ways to that worst problem.

[-] veganpizza69@lemmy.vg 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I dont think the weather is going to be our worst problem. Its going to be ourselves.

Climate is not weather per se. Climate heating and chaos means that drinking water and food are going to become an issue; that's while you're taking in smoke pollution outdoors and sweltering indoors.

I'm not concerned with AI so much for the simple fact that electric grids, data centers and even chip production aren't going to do well in a hot and chaotic climate.

[-] Shayeta@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago

Where do you think most food comes from? Temperature controlled greenhouses?

[-] The_Terrible_Humbaba@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 week ago

I dont think the weather is going to be our worst problem. Its going to be ourselves.

Some places have had more and more frequent heatwaves that lead to deaths in each year. And they are getting worse. Some ares in the world are having trouble growing food, dislocating people, and those areas are increasing in size. I can't recall the exact number, but I think by 2050 the US will have a very big problem when it comes to growing food.

[-] 1984@lemmy.today -3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Those estimates cant take into account new technology or developments that will happen during 25 years.

We will be alright. If we dont die in wars started by our dear so called "leaders".

this post was submitted on 15 May 2025
235 points (97.2% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

6582 readers
440 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS