407

A second lawyer for Rudy Giuliani is seeking to depart his legal team in Georgia, sources familiar with the matter tell ABC News, a move that would appear to leave the former New York City mayor without any local lawyers in the state.

A motion to withdraw has been submitted to the clerk, the sources said. A judge in the case has to sign off on the motion.

News of the move comes after several other former attorneys of the Trump ally have sued Giuliani for failure to pay his bills, including his longtime friend and attorney Bob Costello, who sued Giuliani for over $1 million in payments due to his firm.

Earlier, an additional lawyer for Giuliani in Georgia, David Wolfe, submitted his own motion to withdraw from his representation of Giuliani.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Uncle_Bagel@midwest.social 97 points 1 year ago

Well, fortunately for Giuliani, this is a criminal proceeding so he qualifies for a public defender if he cant afford a lawyer.

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 61 points 1 year ago

They say only a fool represents himself, so he qualifies for that, too!

[-] medgremlin@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 year ago

I don't know if he's quite that poor yet. Georgia only provides public defenders to defendants with a household income below two times the federal poverty line (or thereabouts, I forget the precise multiplier). That's why one of the other Georgia defendants didn't have a defense lawyer while he was being held pending bail.

[-] yokonzo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

That's... A little fucked up, what if you don't meet a certain quota of poor you just... Can't be represented?

[-] medgremlin@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 year ago

Apparently? I think it's something they need to look into fixing that, especially given how low the federal poverty line is set.

[-] vivadanang@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

could you imagine being the poor shit public defender who picked that short straw? defending murderers, rapists, thieves and cheats is one thing... defending that? He's like a pustule of hypocrisy on legs.

They don't get paid enough for that.

And whatever happens, the trumpies will blame said public defender and threaten their life.

[-] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

blame said public defender and threaten their life.

I feel like Public Defender is where newly-minted lawyers get started. New lawyers that may not have much money, and don't live in a nice safe neighbirhood, making such threats very real.

[-] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 40 points 1 year ago

Kind of surprising Rudy is still alive if he drinks as heavily as they say. His liver must be pickled and he's pushing 80.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

His lawyer must have left after having to advise him that "taking the fifth" didn't mean he could take the whole bottle of Vodka with him on the stand....

[-] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

Yeah I think he's only got about four seasons left in him

[-] superkret@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

Luckily the crematorium is right around the corner.

[-] TechyDad@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Looks like he turned the other way and headed into the dildo shop.

(Seriously, of ALL the locations to pick, that had to be the funniest. Rudy is either an idiot or a comedy genius.)

[-] negativeyoda@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Alcohol is a preservative

[-] crusa187@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago

Sucks to be a 2bit criminal lackey.

[-] angelsomething@lemmy.one 13 points 1 year ago

Oh no!

Anyways.

[-] workerONE@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I read today that his drinking is such a well known problem that Trump might not be able to say he was acting on legal advice from his lawyer since it was obvious his lawyer was fucked up

this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2023
407 points (99.3% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2002 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS