636
all 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] flossdaily@lemmy.world 178 points 1 year ago

Forbes has never attempted to verify this list anyway. It's all self-reporting, and it's well established that Trump lied to get on the list.

The guy is such an embarrassment that he even pretended to be his own assistant, calling people to tell him how great he was.

And they recognized his voice. They knew it was this loser pretending to be his own assistant.

Think how sad that is, for a guy who legitimately could have just hired a PR person to do this.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

John Barron?

I honestly think every single media outlet should bring that up in any given article on him: "Donnie, AKA 'John Barron', .... yadda yadda..."

[-] GratefullyGodless@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, but it was a simple explanation, his kid with Melania is named Baron, so obviously he brought his kid into the family business before he was even conceived.

[-] microphone900@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

Why do I have a memory of him doing this early on in his presidency? Like, I hazily remember a call to a reporter threatening war with North Korea and then the Pentagon saying 'We don't know who called, they don't represent us, it's all bullshit.' Did I dream that up or did it get lost in all the stuff he got into over 4 years?

[-] JustZ@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

New Mandela Effect? I remember it too.

[-] BeardyGrumps@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 year ago

To be fair I pretend to be my own secretary when answering cold callers.. I urge others to do the same. You can get them running round in loops..

[-] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 98 points 1 year ago

He lied his way onto the original list in 1982, by telling a reporter he had more of his father’s fortune in his own name than was actually the case.

[-] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 58 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't care about lists of wealth hoarders, I want a list of all the people who have lost gross amounts of wealth and why. And lets start with a list but try to keep expanding it until its a pamphlet, or a book, or a tome.

edit: corrected typo

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago
[-] rthmchgs@lemmynsfw.com 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

His supporters don't. They'll say it was liberal persecution or some such bullshit.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

You just wait, he'll bitch and moan about this at his next rally. This sort of thing seriously pisses him off.

[-] Naja_kaouthia@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago

Does Vegas have odds yet for him calling it fake news?

[-] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

It's nearly a guarante so they don't take lines of that sort anymore.

[-] Overzeetop@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

people who have lost gross amounts of wealth and why

I would like to start a list with the "why" filled in as "beheading" and just begin populating it from the top down.

[-] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago

Good idea. People remember Theranos but Elizabeth Holmes might not even make the top 100.

[-] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 5 points 1 year ago

I want a list of the wealthiest and how they came into their wealth. Why? Because that way I know who to keep an eye out for. :)

Also, I'm less pissed off at people who inherit wealth than the ones who horde it. Someone who inherits billions and then doesn't use it isn't nearly as bad as someone who has billions because they crushed everyone else under their heel. The former didn't ask to be born into that life, but the latter sought it out. That doesn't mean the former is blameless, but they're not necessarily evil like the latter.

[-] LarryTheMatador@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] Syrc@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

In a just world the “wealthy” would have at most 100 times the wealth of the poorest person on earth, and it would barely matter.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 56 points 1 year ago

How the hell was he on there in the first place?

[-] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 68 points 1 year ago

Fraud, mostly.

[-] ForestOrca@kbin.social 48 points 1 year ago

Fraud, as we're about to see in the NY case.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 34 points 1 year ago

He's about to have his Trump Org business assets liquidated by a court-appointed Receiver vis-a-vis the NY fraud case he just lost, so unless he can grift enough money from his base off of the residual soundbites and manufactured outrage (unlikely), he's not coming anywhere near that list again.

He could potentially make millions of his grift, but I don't think billions. He's not getting back on that list.

[-] lingh0e@lemmy.film 27 points 1 year ago

I feel like this probably hits him harder than the prospect of jail.

[-] kautau@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Good, let his empire of lies collapse and let those that have been grifted by supporting him either realize their mistake or just get angry and we can laugh at them for being idiots

[-] cahhts@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

Fuck this guy

[-] erased_tapes@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Ya know, if we all stop talking about him, he might eventually go away.

[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago

We tried that for a while (the entire early 2000s), and it didn’t work.

We need to ruthlessly ridicule him and anyone who supports him. Embarrassment seems to be the only thing that works. It takes more than normal to embarrass him, but it does work. See: Stormy Daniels mushroom analogy. One of the only things he shut up about.

[-] finkrat@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Beginning of the end? Where's my popcorn

[-] Surp@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago
this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2023
636 points (97.3% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2167 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS