14
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Also it’s not just a trans thing.

JK is incredibly ableist and regularly mocks disabled people. For example one of her latest books is basically painting all chronically ill people as malingerers.

[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

It's in her HP books. The editor just tampered it down, but you can still see it now that we have a pattern. It's why I hate the people who say, "hate the artist, but love the art" bullshit. The art is bad as well and I'm proud I bailed on that series half way though.

[-] unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 weeks ago

I like the comparison of Harry Potter to Lord of the Rings that points out Harry Potter was a very special, perhaps ethnically special boy, who deserved his powers because he was naturally good, while Frodo Baggins was a dude who got saddled with an absurd level of responsibility, which he never could have handled without a long list of friends and randos who found it amusing to help him.

[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

If it was just Harry, it would just be an over used clique, but ethnic or birth traits kept coming up. Hagrid is naturally angry. Voldemort is evil because he was a rape baby. House Elves are natural ~~slaves~~servants. The Weasley family will always be poor(even when Harry should be paying rent or at least buying them a new car).

[-] andros_rex@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Voldemort is evil because he was a rape baby.

As a sorta half blood rape baby, this has always driven me mad. I am not evil because my conception was.

[-] unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 weeks ago

well that is more Harry Potter information than I previously had, but I'll just move on and pretend to be dumber than I am, which is already pretty bad. when I was kid I gathered an embarassing amount of knowledge on Stephen King novels. I didn't really expect him to be one of the good guys in 2025, but there he is.

[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I gave up on HP half way through, but the topic kept coming up so when I saw what looked like a good review everything on yt, I put it on in the back ground.

Oh, right. The Irish character kept blowing things up.

[-] unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 weeks ago

well I just get more and more impressed with Rowling the more I learn

[-] shaquilleoatmeal@lemm.ee 2 points 3 weeks ago

And one of her more recent blow-ups was against asexual people.

[-] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago

Minecraft Creator notch went the same way, as did Dilbert author..

I'm convinced there's a cabal of billionaires that either get dirt on people on the rise and corrupt/blackmail them, or eliminate people who are not corruptable before they get too rich/powerful. It doesn't take much to kill someone, and neuvo riche probably aren't prepared for the precautions they'd actually need to take.

That and money corrupts (or so we're told, seems like it'd make as much sense that people who hoard money corrupt)

[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Scott Adams was always insane. Behind the Bastards covered him. Before twitter, we just inserted our own meaning into the short comics. When he had more time to write a story in the cartoon, there were signs. I remember the Bob Bastard episode and how he views people who give to charity.

You should watch Shaun's video on the Harry Potter series. He goes into a deep dive of how the books are littered with her political views - even the first one - and how you can watch her become more conservative as they progress and she became more wealthy: the books start out criticizing the system, but by the end, the message becomes that the system should never be questioned.

Throughout the books are a pattern of borderline racist stereotypes (the black kid is named Shacklebolt, the Asian girl is named two single syllable last names - might as well be named Ching Chong - the 15-year-old Irish kid is obsessed with whiskey and blowing stuff up, etc), but you can also see where her transphobia came from. Everytime she wants you to hate a woman in the books, she describes them as having some kind of masculine features, from a strong jawline to "mannish hands."

As people become more wealthy or famous, they're given a bigger microphone to cast their garbage opinions with and it's never been easier to tell the world your shitty political beliefs than it is right now.

[-] Shayeta@feddit.org 1 points 3 weeks ago

Money/power doesn't corrupt, it liberates you from the consequences of your actions. It allows you to freely be fully true to yourself without fear of repercussions.

[-] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago

Solution? Trans-positive fanfiction that celebrates the parts you’re nostalgic for, but doesn’t financially benefit Rowling

[-] TheSambassador@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago

Trans Wizard Harriet Porber by Chuck Tingle unironically slaps.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 weeks ago
[-] InputZero@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

You would think that of all the non-heteosexual sexualities that asexual people would be the least likely for someone to be prejudice against. I understand that asexuality is a spectrum and any generalization about any large group of people lacks accuracy but, generally I've found aces just want to be left alone. Something I think we can all appreciate every now and again. They're just not interested in romantic and/or sexual relationships. The first decade of my life was like that, I think the first decade of most people's lives are like that. What's so hard to understand about people who just don't feel that attraction?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

"These people aren't fucking exactly the right amount."

[-] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 1 points 4 weeks ago

Moreover, ACAB includes Harry Potter

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] joel_feila@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

This is why i call it separating the artisr from the finance, the art is just unavoidable collateral damage.

Perfect example. Hp Lovecraft is dead he gains no money, rallies no crowd, calls no lawmaker. JkR does still, she does gain money and spends it trying to make the world worse for people.

[-] Kickforce@lemmy.wtf 2 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah and Lovecraft came to see his racism was wrong before the end of his short life. Rowling so far has only clamped down harder on her detrimental bullshit.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago

Lovecraft is problematic for other reasons.

The problem is that what makes his work good is this pathological fear of the other, that he interlinks with xenophobia and notions of racial purity in his fiction.

You can't love the art and hate the author with Lovecraft, you have to accept they're both pretty fucked up.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Lovecraft is also a different case. It should be obvious now that he was a clinical xenophobe and was afraid of most things. He wasn't really looking to put other people down to compensate for his own shortcomings. If Lovecraft was still alive, I wouldn't argue with people boycotting him, but he's not the same as JK.

[-] Eyedust@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago

I won't be able to ever shake off Harry Potter. I don't think of points and views, I just love the idea of another world to go learn magic away from tech and such. I don't read or listen to it for the political points, or whatever other trash she's hidden in there. I read it as a form of escapism.

That said, I absolutely hate Rowling. Its to the point that I'm embarrassed that I still like HP. I hate the stupid shit that pukes out her mouth and I hate that she's taken a whole fanbase down with her. I feel like, for just liking Harry Potter, I'm labeled a patriarchal fascist and that's not my stance at all. I was an innocent kid who fell in love and still uses the books as a safe place to this very day, because I took refuge in them when my mother was at her most abusive (physically and mentally).

When I was very young, I would daydream about being taken away from her to another world to just dive into magic. She would lie to my therapists and tell them I had mental issues and a vivid imagination. That it was all in my head that she abused me. No one believed me when I cried for help. I was tested for autism. I was diagnosed with severe ADHD. There was one time in elementary school where they tried to take my video game magazine from me in class and I was hysterical, screaming that the demons in my head were going to get me. They blamed the magazine material (Mortal Kombat with Baraka on the front cover, I actually still have it). I was treated as though I was crazy.

It was pure, mind-altering hell. She won every court case over my father on the mere fact that she was my mother. She tried to have me put on numerous drugs as a kid, but my father refused and they needed both parent's consent. So that's why I'm irrationally addicted to the books. I'm not so vulnerable as to have my moral views swayed by a fictional story. However, Rowling will never get another cent from me if I can help it. My audiobooks are already pirated as is. I just wish I could be more honest about loving the books without having to tell this story and not be regarded as a piece of shit for liking them.

[-] i_dont_want_to@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 weeks ago

Her work did really speak to me as a young gay child in a place where it wasn't ok. That being said, fuck the author. Haven't gone to the park, haven't seen the new movies, haven't played the new games, haven't given her any money in well over a decade.

In this day and age, I can easily find entertainment elsewhere. Anyone else that loved her work can do the same.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 weeks ago

They are....billionaires. That is the common denominator of horrible people. They think that because they are rich beyond measure that their opinions should rule the world. The world would be a much much better place if we were rid of the pestilence of the billionaire class and maybe the '$100s of millions' class. No one gets to being a billionaire by being completely honest, law abiding, fair, moral and ethical. Rules must be ignored in the quest for superlative riches. Those rules are only for those who haven't become rich enough to ignore them. Even if they seem like benign benefactors, scratch the surface and you will find they are, without exception, evil.

[-] Kolanaki@pawb.social 1 points 4 weeks ago

Also like Elon Musk, her origin story is a load of bullshit.

[-] Goretantath@lemm.ee 1 points 4 weeks ago

Fuck rowling, i pirate ALL her shit. Ill do what i want with the I.P. and nobody can stop me.

[-] Kolanaki@pawb.social 1 points 4 weeks ago

"I'll make my own Hogwarts! With blackjack, and hookers!"

[-] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Same, I love HP. It's probably my all time favourite series, but I haven't paid her a cent since she showed her true colours, and I never will again. So I pirate.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 23 May 2025
14 points (93.8% liked)

Microblog Memes

8191 readers
1054 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS