120
submitted 2 weeks ago by Olap@lemmy.world to c/climate@slrpnk.net

The law does not provide defenses for justified civil disruption in the UK. So this isn't a surprise sentence. Indigo here is a martyr and she deserves to be celebrated for her service, long may we see more nonviolent protests

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago

It's so stupid for the government to fail to provide for lawful dissent. "How do we deal with these disreputable little proles, eh? How about instead of letting them be slightly bored standing out in the weather, let's make them into heroes and martyrs! Hmmyes, that's the bunny."

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 7 points 2 weeks ago

Seriously. The headwinds against protest are that it's kind of an imposition and people worry it doesn't have any impact. Do absolutely nothing and it'll probably evaporate. Come down on them like a load of bricks and it signals to a lot more people that it's important. The CBP doing Gestapo kidnappings in Portland during BLM spawned a whole new wave of protest participation.

[-] kurikai@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago

Just protest in a more violent manner? You will get less punishment that way

[-] ccmskw@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 weeks ago

The judge stated that “the stance taken by you [by pleading not guilty] distinguishes you all from others who have chosen to follow the long and honourable tradition of civil disobedience on conscientious grounds, that is accepting that you have broken the law and accepting the punishment that follows”.

This requirement alone–to have to plead (not) guilty–is characteristic of a perverted justice system. Why force the defendant to anticipate the verdict of their own trial? This is ridiculous. This is to be found out by the trial, not prejudged by one party. Pleading serves only to intimidate defendants and frustrate their defense strategy, and so it is an expression of a bias of the state, which is overrepresented in court by four parties (judge, jury, prosecutor, and author of the laws), towards ordinary (non-corporation) people. It has no place in a society with rule of law.

this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2025
120 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

6728 readers
420 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS