872
submitted 3 weeks ago by geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml to c/usa@lemmy.ml
(page 2) 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] sartalon@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Don't get me wrong. The Iran - Contra affair was a terrible circumvention of U.S. law and North deserved to go to prison and Reagan should have been impeached.

However, this post is a mischaracterization of that event.

This was part of an overall plan to get American hostages released.

That being said, we sold arms to Iran, who was fighting Iraq (a U.S. ally at the time), and one of the intermediaries we used was fucking Israel.

Yup, Israel helped us sell arms to Iran. So Iran can turn around and use them against an ally.

North was then made a fall guy.

I was younger when this happened but I recall, at the time, it was characterized as we just sold them parts for their airplanes and defensive arms.

Man, we just can't stop fucking our face with our own foot.

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmings.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

North wasn't the "Fall Guy." That makes him sound like a scapegoat, which he wasn't, he was the guy managing the entire operation.

Also, it wasn't part of an operation to get the Iranian hostages released. They had been released back in 1980, as soon as Reagan had been inaugurated. The Iran-Contra Conspiracy happened later, but the wound from that humiliating episode was still stinging in the American psyche. The fact that North was selling weapons to our bitterest enemy at the time is only one of the things that made this such an egregious violation.

Iran-Contra was about providing weapons, training, and support to the conservative soldiers fighting the establishment of a Russian-supported regime in Central America.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2025
872 points (99.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

8260 readers
662 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS