1203
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org 20 points 3 days ago

Even if they were trying to use this sort of rule with wholesome intentions, I'm not sure how targeting groups by name instead of deed makes sense. It's like doing a healthy diet by giving up Coca-Cola by name even though Pepsi and RC have the same nutritional profile and availability. Enjoy the Whack-a-mole game!

Taken to its logical conclusion, someone should start a pro-Palestinian squad and call it the Reform Party.

[-] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 9 points 3 days ago

The group in question broke onto an airbase and put a couple of RAF planes out of action. They crossed a red line for the government.

[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 days ago

Oh boy wait till you hear what the suffragettes were willing to do for another righteous cause, a bit over a century ago. I don't know man, maybe the government should start reexamining its policies if ordinary people among its citizens are willing to start breaking into airbase and damaging their own planes.

[-] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

They were willing to commit mass murder in London and Dublin, and to assassinate the Prime Minister. Also deeply keen on removing all Jews from the House of Commons. Things that today would indeed mark them as a terrorist organisation.

Later, Emmeline Pankhurst would found a political party with the aim of requiring all civil servants to prove their racial purity back at least 3 generations, and many of the more prominent members of the WSPU became prominent members of the British fascist movement, several being detained as a precaution during the second European fuss.

As a campaign, the WSPU was an abject failure. It put women’s votes back a decade, and Pankhurst failed to ensure that working class women were excluded from the franchise (she also wanted working class men excluded).

It was only a cataclysm the scale of WWI, and the groundwork of the suffragists working in opposition to the suffragettes, which brought votes for all.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] apotheotic@beehaw.org 5 points 2 days ago

Nothing they did makes them terrorists, no matter what you think of the action they took

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[-] WolfmanEightySix@piefed.social 17 points 3 days ago

Some Aussie comedian on KGB News has just said that the disabled should be shot or starved into work …but a few people holding signs is the problem. How baffling.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Cypher@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago

The Brits need to make like the French and lop heads off until they have something resembling a functional democracy.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

It's so much easier for the frog to not realize it's being boiled in the UK because there's no consolidated constitution to point to

[-] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 15 points 3 days ago

Not sure that matters too much, frogs in the US are boiling fine too. The constitution can be brushed aside just as easily.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2025
1203 points (98.1% liked)

United Kingdom

5081 readers
278 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS