85
all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] fargeol@lemmy.world 35 points 2 days ago
[-] Ephera@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 day ago

Hmm, Debian and other long-term support distros are kind of in a tricky position with problems like these. On the one hand, they don't want to break things, so they'll often make changes like these relatively late. But on the other hand, someone might still run a current version of the distro in 2038, so they actually want to solve it as early as possible, too.

[-] Tja@programming.dev 20 points 2 days ago

But that's not a solution, it's just postponing the problem!!1!one

[-] AnarchistArtificer@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

"it's just postponing the problem!!1!one" The thing of including a "one" to make the irony of your exclamation abundantly clear is a delightful bit of internet-ese. I always find it funny when I see it

[-] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 day ago

For me the giveaway was 2^64 being 1.8*10^19 years from now.

[-] Tja@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago

Thanks! I find it nicer than including "/s" at the end :)

[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 10 points 2 days ago

True, but only if the latest theories on Big Crunch being back on the table don't hold up. Debian ought to not only push out 64 bit time, but place "now" right in the middle to cover any discoveries of an older universe. Hell, they ought to do that and make it 128 bit, to cover anything.

Exponentials can be profound when you grasp them for that fleeting second.

[-] over_clox@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

'...(potentially setting time back to 1900)...'

From my understanding, unless I'm mistaken, wouldn't the 32 bit time reset back to 1970 after the overflow/rollover?

[-] fargeol@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_2038_problem

Timestamps that use signed int will go back to 1901 (-2,147,483,647)

[-] over_clox@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

Oh shit, I missed that part, I always thought it was an unsigned int.. ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ

Well today I learned ๐Ÿ‘

[-] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 2 days ago

you're wrong, but so was the article, so I guess that cancels out :D it's late 1901

[-] eah@programming.dev 17 points 2 days ago

There are 2 hard problems in computer science: cache invalidation, naming things, and off-by-1 errors.

[-] glimse@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

That's just a really solid joke.

[-] data1701d@startrek.website 9 points 2 days ago

The actual transition happened ages ago - 2024 or so. A bunch of transitional packages in Testing and Sid had -t64 appended for a while.

this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2025
85 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

8623 readers
735 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS