539
submitted 6 days ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to c/globalnews@lemmy.zip

The petition addressed that MasterCard and Visa must stop censoring legal fictional content that complies with the law and platform standards.

Archived version: https://archive.is/20250725225542/https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/mastercard-visa-under-fire-petition-payment-giants-not-police-legal-content-blows-1739406

Petition: https://www.change.org/p/tell-mastercard-visa-activist-groups-stop-controlling-what-we-can-watch-read-or-play


Disclaimer: The article linked is from a single source with a single perspective. Make sure to cross-check information against multiple sources to get a comprehensive view on the situation.

all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] RegalPotoo@lemmy.world 143 points 6 days ago

Financial networks either need "network neutrality" rules or maybe that monopoly needs to get broken up

[-] grue@lemmy.world 42 points 5 days ago

"Common carrier" is the jargon you're looking for.

[-] Natanael@infosec.pub 32 points 5 days ago

Either you're a bank under strict regulations when you're handling that kind of money, or you have no business processing that kind of money. PayPal & co dodges most regulations due to technically not being a bank, but at that size they shouldn't be able to abuse loopholes.

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Well my adult game content provider uses paypal and they have not been affected by this bullshit.

[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 13 points 5 days ago

Is that because of using PayPal, or because they're small enough to have slid under the radar of these busybodies?

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago

They aren't small, they make a shit ton of adult games. I original found their games on Steam. But found you can buy uncensored version straight from the dev. With Steam you had to get a patch.

That's what makes no sense the adult games on Sream were censored, so there was no prom to begin with. Unless you downloaded a separate patch. And you had to know how to do that.

I hope its PayPal, because if this happens to them fhey are practically out of business. Because all they make is Japanese anime porn games.

[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 4 points 5 days ago

Wait, you're talking about a single developer? That's almost certainly going to be tiny. They might be relatively big for a NSFW game dev company, but that's still miniscule compared to what we're talking about here: Steam and Itch.

[-] castlebravo404@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 5 days ago

Uh, there definitely were non censored adult games on Steam.

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Really guess it was just the one I bought.

[-] BigTurkeyLove@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago
[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 5 days ago

Fiduciary Responsibility Simulator 2009

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Nothing but I bought an adult game called Treasure Hunter Claire. They have tons more. I hsd an idea to do lets play videos but on Pornhub. But then Oklahoma came along with that law and now Pornhub is blockef here. I.do have a vpn. But I was not wanting to use that to do this with.

[-] BigTurkeyLove@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

I'm also from Oklahoma! VPN is a must here.

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Oh I have a vpn and use it. Just wish I didn't have to.

[-] Eril@feddit.org 21 points 5 days ago

Give me some European competition please. I'm not happy about all of them being American...

[-] Geth@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 5 days ago

Individual countries already have their own versions and an EU level version is beeing rolled out. Let's see how it works out.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wero_(payment)

https://wero-wallet.eu/

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 days ago

Check out Taler

[-] JustTheWind@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago

No joke. Payment processors absolutely need to be treated as a utility. Stuff like this is exactly why it's such a big deal to reinstate/protect net-neutrality as well. What we're watching right now with payment processors isn't even end-game yet for what they potentially could do, and it already sucks. I can't even imagine once ISP start doing the same thing. Monopolies are the death of consumer rights. The unabated power, corruption, and corporately bought and controlled laws/ governing bodies makes the entire prospect even worse.

[-] e461h@sh.itjust.works 44 points 5 days ago

Remember when Visa and Mastercard made a big deal defending the right to buy guns on their platform? https://finance.yahoo.com/news/visa-won-t-block-gun-180848343.html

[-] fistac0rpse@fedia.io 57 points 6 days ago

Does a change.org petition with 100k signatures really count as "under fire"? Fuck them, but I doubt this will do anything sadly

[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 16 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

This happened in the first place because Collective Shout turned up and said "A bunch of people are pissed off about this, do something about it." They're not a government or a major corporation, they're just a group that represents people, no different than Change.org. If a petition caused this, why can't a petition stop it?

[-] Draegur@lemmy.zip 21 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Psychologically speaking there are now upwards of 100k people who all agree on this issue and at least some of them could potentially be mobilized in additional ways now that they know they're far from alone on how they feel.

Goodness knows that if I were told there were something I could do as part of this cohort that individually might be ineffectual but would be a death by several dozen thousand cuts for the scumbags pulling this horseshit... I'd act on it.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

100,000 people who are still essentially required to use their services for most commerce and will continue to do so.

So many vendors won't take Amex or Discover due to their higher processing fees you can't really even boycott them effectively.

[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

The members of Collective Shout are in exactly the same position. So why did the payment processors listen to them?

The fact that this whole issue even occurred is proof that public pressure, when applied smartly, does in fact work.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

Exactly. Collective shout argued that these companies would lose face by processing these payments. A targeted mass response will inform them that the opposite is true

[-] Draegur@lemmy.zip 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

yes, can't boycott. MAYBE can do other things. Hell, if I heard that people were doing something mildly illegal en masse to fuck things up for Visa and MasterCard, I might actually consider doing it myself as well. MIGHT.

or something totally legal that isn't a boycott like showing up at their headquarters in a crowd of thousands. |

SOME people might cross the line into illegality by molotovs or other such 'implements'.

[-] mriswith@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

I'm honestly curious: Are you one of the people who doesn't understand how the number can be represenative how the wider populace feels? Or are you one of those who are just trying to downplay the whole thing?

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

I'm saying Visa and Mastercard have zero reason to change their practices because people don't really have an option not to use their services no matter how upset they are.

[-] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago

40k got this whole thing going, didn't it?

[-] oscardejarjayes@hexbear.net 10 points 6 days ago

It was about 1,000 people from Collective Shout (who have a whopping 40,000 supporters) that got the payment processors to pull the NSFW

[-] Photuris@lemmy.ml 10 points 6 days ago

Has a change.org petition ever changed anything, ever?

[-] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Yes. Literally hundreds of thousands of times they have succeeded in getting what the petitioners were asking for.

Sick of this apathy crap.

https://www.change.org/impact

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

What's really needed is a letter and email campaign

[-] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 11 points 5 days ago

Att first i thought it was just PayPal. Not great but ok. Fair enough.

But Visa and MasterCard blocking stuff is not ok. Their position is too big. And too crucial in the infrastructure.

But. A bank that can get something new rolling should profit quite well, which is a good incentive to come up with alternative

[-] notsure@fedia.io 11 points 6 days ago

...the purse strings, it's always the purse strings...

[-] Etterra@discuss.online 3 points 4 days ago

It won't matter.bi mean nothing will change. Everyone will have to keep using their services and most people just don't know or care. Until a new company that does the same job but without the bullshit (preferably a co-op) flights its way into the industry to break their monopoly, morning will change.

[-] adespoton@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 days ago

Am I the only one who thought from the headline that MC and Visa were censoring fake legal documents and not adult entertainment?

this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2025
539 points (100.0% liked)

Global News

4521 readers
429 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.
Country prefixCountry prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) where title is not clear enough from which country the news is coming from.


Rules

This community is moderated in accordance with the principles outlined in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which emphasizes the right to freedom of opinion and expression. In addition to this foundational principle, we have some additional rules to ensure a respectful and constructive environment for all users.

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon generated via LLM model | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS