62
submitted 1 week ago by Zerush@lemmy.ml to c/science@lemmy.ml

In January 2024, physicists Arnab Priya Saha and Aninda Sinha at the Indian Institute of Science discovered a new formula for calculating pi while studying string theory interactions[^1]. Their research, published in Physical Review Letters, presents a series representation that converges much faster than historical methods - requiring only 30 terms to reach 10 decimal places, compared to 5 billion terms needed for the 15th century Madhava series[^1][^2].

The formula emerged unexpectedly while the researchers were developing models to understand quantum particle scattering using string theory, which treats fundamental particles as tiny vibrating strings[^1]. "Our efforts, initially, were never to find a way to look at pi," said Sinha. "We were excited when we got a new way to look at pi."[^3]

The discovery has sparked debate in the mathematics community. While some highlight its theoretical significance, others like mathematician Peter Woit argue the findings have been over-hyped in media coverage[^4]. The formula's key innovation is a free parameter λ that allows for infinitely many representations of pi, with Madhava's historical series emerging as a special case when λ approaches infinity[^1].

[^1]: Scientific American - String Theorists Accidentally Find a New Formula for Pi

[^2]: Physical Review Letters - Field theory expansions of string theory amplitudes

[^3]: IISc - IISc Physicists Find a New Way to Look at Mathematics' Pi

[^4]: Columbia Math - Latest Breakthrough From String Theory

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Zerush@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Pi is certainly a strange thing, not only a number to calculate circles, Pi is also found almost everywhere in the nature, in trigonometry and even in Heisenbergs uncertainty principle.

[-] Late-Boomer-57@piefed.ca 11 points 1 week ago

No surprise it is found in the strings at the very core of reality.

[-] Greg@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago

Formula? It's called a recipe

[-] TankieTanuki@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago

you mean recipe

[-] Zerush@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Curious also Euler's identity

e^iπ^ + 1 = 0

this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2025
62 points (98.4% liked)

Science

17009 readers
19 users here now

Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage


founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS