72
submitted 11 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.) donned a red “A” on her shirt Tuesday after her vote to oust former Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) left her feeling “demonized” on Capitol Hill, she said.

“I’m wearing the scarlet letter after the week that I just had, last week, being a woman up here and being demonized for my vote and for my voice,” Mace told reporters, apparently referencing the 19th century novel in which the protagonist was condemned to wear a red “A” — a “scarlet letter” — after becoming pregnant out of wedlock.

What??

all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Buffaloaf@lemmy.world 71 points 11 months ago
[-] YottaDren@lemmy.world 38 points 11 months ago

In her defense, she's probably only seen the movie "Easy A"...

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 24 points 11 months ago

That movie was better than it had any right to be.

[-] Subverb@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Agreed. It's pretty good.

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 49 points 11 months ago

A for “attention whore” :P

But honestly: cry more. You’re a member of the Republican Party, Mace. You know who they are and what their agenda is. None of this should be surprising to you.

[-] RojoSanIchiban@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

Also "Amnesia" when she just kind of forgot about Gymbag Jordan's coverup of molested wrestlers in an interview the other day.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 39 points 11 months ago

What does she think that means?

[-] NounsAndWords@lemmy.world 37 points 11 months ago
[-] tburkhol@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago

You see, the original scarlet letter was put on some woman just fighting for her freedom in an oppressive society. She was a pioneer of female empowerment in a patriarchal society, just like Mace, who's being oppressed for exercising her first amendment right to say "no" to functioning government.

[-] Bbbbbbbbbbb@lemmy.world 31 points 11 months ago

Has she tried not being a Republican?

[-] holiday@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

They can keep her.

[-] Chozo@kbin.social 29 points 11 months ago

This will become the new 1984.

By that I mean, a book that Republicans haven't read but love to reference with what they think it means.

[-] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 22 points 11 months ago

Republican political theater is so transparent

[-] FoundTheVegan@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago

Republican politics, in their entirety, is demonize and disrupt Democrats.

[-] Kalkaline@leminal.space 21 points 11 months ago

I would never shame a woman for becoming pregnant outside of wedlock. It's silly. I would instead hope that the woman has legal access to effective birth control methods if they choose to use them, legal and safe access to abortions if they so choose, and I would hope she has access to prenatal care as well as healthcare for her and the baby postpartum. I would also hope the mother and child have available social safety nets that cover their basic needs for life including access to education.

[-] LemmyFeed@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago

Half the government are older than dirt and the other half are living in an immature fantasy land like they're back in junior high.

[-] seaQueue@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

I mean, it's kind of appropriate? She fucked around and now she's finding out that the Republican rage cycle eats its own.

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 7 points 11 months ago

Who'd she fuck?

She knows what the red A signifies, right?

[-] theostermanweekend@lemmy.ml 6 points 11 months ago

Sure. Performances sure beat doing the actual Work.

[-] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago

I, too, daydream about being persecuted despite being influential and wealthy.

[-] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Wasn't this just posted a day or two ago? Same exact article.

[-] CarlsIII@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago

Some of the same exact comments too.

[-] paddirn@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

She’s got nice boobs. The A gives a convenient cover for staring.

[-] ripcord@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

Ah, shit. Watching her stupid clip in the video in that article gave me cancer.

this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
72 points (90.0% liked)

politics

18898 readers
3298 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS