676
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Chariotwheel@kbin.social 235 points 1 year ago

They were dragged from the vehicle - marked "TV" in red tape - searched and pushed against a wall.

Mr Tutunji and Mr Abudiab said they identified themselves as BBC journalists and showed police their press ID cards.

While attempting to film the incident, Mr Tutunji said his phone was thrown on the ground and he was struck on the neck.

Fuck, and here I thought "okay, maybe a honest mistake, tensions are running high". But nope, pure malice.

[-] AnarchoDakosaurus@toast.ooo 243 points 1 year ago

IDF killed a Reuters reporter earlier today with Helicopter. They've blown up the Al Jazeera offices during previous wars and shot Shireen Abu Akleh dead while she was clearly marked as press.

This is no mistake. There is a pattern of suppressing and killing journalists who don't report the story in their favor.

[-] DAMunzy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 1 year ago

Don't forget "Collateral Murder":

On July 12, 2007, a series of air-to-ground attacks were conducted by a team of two U.S. AH-64 Apache helicopters in Al-Amin al-Thaniyah, New Baghdad, during the Iraqi insurgency which followed the invasion of Iraq. On April 5, 2010, the attacks received worldwide coverage and controversy following the release of 39 minutes of classified gunsight footage by WikiLeaks. The video, which WikiLeaks titled Collateral Murder, showed the crew firing on a group of people and killing several of them, including two Reuters journalists, and then laughing at some of the casualties, all of whom were civilians. An anonymous U.S. military official confirmed the authenticity of the footage, which provoked global discussion on the legality and morality of the attacks.

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago

What's your point? "Collateral Murder" was the US military. Just whataboutism?

Both things are bad.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

The biggest issue with that was the US denying involvement until the video was released. The actions of the helicopter crew make sense in context when watching the video.

There were RPGs and rifles in the group that was 100 yards from US ground forces that had been under attack by small arms fire and RPGs. The camera equipment appeared to be additional weaponry, and the reporters wore no identifying gear and had not informed the military of their location.

When a cameraman pointed his camera at US troops, the long telephoto lens appeared from the chopper to be an RPG, so the gunner fired on him and on the support van that drove up on scene.

When boots arrive at the scene, the soldiers find weapons and cameras, and immediately try to evacuate the wounded children. It should be noted that one of the journalists who died died at the hospital. If they were really trying to cover things up at that point they would have made sure he died at the scene.

The video proves that the US lied about what happened, but also very clearly demonstrates that there was zero intentional killing of journalists.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Crikeste@lemm.ee 188 points 1 year ago

Are people still saying Israel is the good guys? Do good guys do this?

Do good guys kill Reuters cameramen?

Do good guys bomb hospitals?

Do good guys commit genocide?

[-] AstridWipenaugh@lemmy.world 106 points 1 year ago

Yes, they are. My CEO sent out an email this morning about how he's saddened by "the attacks on Israel" and glad "all our Israeli employees are safe". He closed with "we stand with Israel". No mention of any sadness or fucks given for all the dead Palestinian civilians.

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

God I remember during the George Floyd protests our CEO sent an email statement that was basically "blue lives matter". I was happy to leave that company.

[-] Zeroxxx@lemmy.my.id 17 points 1 year ago

No good guys in wars.

[-] sudo@lemmy.today 15 points 1 year ago

Heh, I had a similar reaction when reading a similar email. There certainly have been "Horrific terrorist attacks". Except from all sides.. for many decades...

[-] P1r4nha@feddit.de 10 points 1 year ago

Our CEO was careful and only mentioned support for the Israeli employees and didn't mention any conflict.

And we're donating to the Red Cross. I think it makes sense.

[-] pdxfed@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

CEO suddenly emailed out a "terrorism is never ok" email early this week expressing concern and acknowledging the pain of the Hamas attacks...as if anything has occured in a vacuum there in the last 60 years.

I do not apologize for the murders by Hamas over the weekend, just as I do not for the now even more retaliatory murders by Israel this week or any killings on either side for decades. Montagues and Capulets both were assholes.

The idea any organizational head from some random industry in a foreign country could even understand the basic dynamics, let alone decades of murder and loss on both sides, and still make a statement that would in any way walk a line of objectivity is so startlingly naive it boggles the mind. And other than their fucking irrepressible egoism, they would claim they're doing this for their employees? Company? Just STFU when you don't know the field of play!

[-] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

There was a controversial and sexist bait letter someone at Google wrote before being let go and it was heavily propped up by right wing media as an example and justification that everything Google does from now on is left wing because they're cancelling this poor sexist man.

My first long term job's company instructed HR to print out the letter and give a strong endorsement of it for seemingly no reason. It basically just read to me as, "Women have strongsuits other than business success like emotions and raising children and their lack of pay is actually justified and good." that they wanted to come from our female head of HR as opposed to our do nothing remote from Florida male CEO. These rich people are no smarter than anyone else, they just use bigger words as they stick their foot down their own throat.

[-] BaldProphet@kbin.social 57 points 1 year ago

Not sure there's such a thing as "good guys" anymore.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] fubo@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

I don't think the Netanyahu regime are the good guys, but I didn't think the Trump regime were the good guys either. I don't endorse blaming a nationality for the actions of shitty leaders, especially shitty leaders who have directly undermined democracy in their countries.

[-] Crikeste@lemm.ee 39 points 1 year ago

Wild to me that you conflated Netanyahu and Trump, rather than Israel and Hamas. But either way, I agree.

I don’t think what Hamas has done is “cool, chill and dope”, but I certainly understand living under the violence of apartheid and becoming violent yourself.

Especially when your prayer, worship and protest are met with military action by your “supervisor”(?)

What else are you supposed to do if you’re a Palestinian? They can’t even live a normal day of peace, that doesn’t exist for them.

[-] fubo@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago

Wild to me that you conflated Netanyahu and Trump, rather than Israel and Hamas.

I consider Netanyahu and Trump to be elements of the modern international neofascist movement, aka "illiberal democracy".

[-] Crikeste@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Makes sense. I just thought it was a little out of left field.

[-] jj4211@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago
[-] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Or, currently, the Killing Fields

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Do good guys commit genocide?

I was arguing with someone about that. Their unwavering position was that population in Gaza is growing, so it cannot be a genocide. UN genocide definition was wrong in their eyes. I tried to compromise to call it "only" ethnic cleansing, they seemed unimpressed. Then they called me a tankie.

Just take that in: it's not a genocide because not enough evil sand people died. What the actual fuck?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] banneryear1868@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

When the news reports deaths, Israeli's are "killed," and Palestinians "die."

[-] jet@hackertalks.com 82 points 1 year ago

The BBC Arabic team and two reporters with Arab sounding names were treated poorly by police.

This could either be a case of racism, or targeting the media, and we don't have enough data to determine which. Neither is a good look

[-] hassanmckusick@lemmy.discothe.quest 62 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

those IDF soldiers would have to be pretty fucking stupid to accidentally do a hate crime on the large van marked "TV" when there are plenty of other people in beating range they could do a hate crime on with no consequences.

Hanlon's razor be damned this was 100% on purpose.

Edit: and it's not like Israel has a history of killing journalists or anything. Please don't look up "Shireen Abu Aqla", nothing to see there

Edit edit: Shireen ain't the only one, ~20 in 20 years.

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago

why would they have to be stupid?

Have you not been paying attention? Israel literally gets away with murder. day in and day out. People and countries are bending over backwards to ignore every atrocity, human rights violation, and warcrime, to paint them as a poor victim.

I guarantee they could have shot those BBC reporters, execution style, in the street, on film, and absolutely nothing would have come from it.

[-] ToAllPointsWest@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Exactly I can't even recall the last time Israel paid a consequence for any of their crimes against the Palestinian people

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Shialac@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I mean, Israeli Police regularly did both before this conflict escalated again, so does it even matter?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] greenmarty@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

I can sort of understand both sides here.

When looking from one POV
innocent journalist.
vs.
crazy killing monsters who only live to kill Palestinians and once there are no Palestinians left there will be no meaning to their life.

Second POV is
people responsible for safety of their country who expect Hammas to try to sneak by any possible means into their territory to continue in previous brutality.
vs.
possible terrorist in disguise

[-] Pieresqi@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

I am glad that Israel haven't been doing something for the last 60 years which would radicalize Palestinians :)

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 20 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


BBC journalists covering the attack on Israel were assaulted and held at gunpoint after they were stopped by police in the Israeli city of Tel Aviv.

Muhannad Tutunji, Haitham Abudiab and their BBC Arabic team were driving to a hotel when their car was intercepted.

"One of our BBC News Arabic teams deployed in Tel Aviv, in a vehicle clearly marked as media, was stopped and assaulted last night by Israeli police.

Palestinian militant group Hamas launched an unprecedented attack on Israel on Saturday, killing at least 1,300 people.

Israel has told those in the north of the Gaza Strip - about 1.1 million people - to relocate to the south of the territory within 24 hours.

Hamas, which controls the Gaza Strip, told civilians to ignore the evacuation order, describing it as "fake propaganda".


The original article contains 271 words, the summary contains 135 words. Saved 50%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] Jaysyn@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago

Israel is doing exactly what the Hamas terrorists wanted them to do. Overreact.

[-] Deceptichum@kbin.social 64 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Israel doing what it’s always done regardless.

Every year you hear of them killing a journalist or reporter, or two.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] blazera@kbin.social 42 points 1 year ago

Hah. Israeli police suppressing European press, "I cant believe Hamas done this"

[-] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Don't know who's down voting you, but yes, this is actually textbook strategy for insurgent warfare.

Little guy makes a move with the goal of provoking big guy to create a security clampdown and overreact. This feeds little guy's PR and recruitment efforts, as well as potentially overstretching big guy's resources.

I even have a recent and precisely on topic video that covers it:

https://youtu.be/UKvzOF-toIA?si=ge1cJA2H7_NtDJcu

He even references the ACTUAL DOD MANUALS that detail this strategy.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

Serious question- and I’m
It being argumentative- this is a question I have wrestled forth myself.

What would proportionate response look like?

[-] VentraSqwal@links.dartboard.social 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Probably something less than genocide and killing unaffiliated reporters

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago

A well executed police raid to drag Hamas' leadership out

This is 1,000,000% corruption coming from the head, so chopping off the head will go a long way towards ending Hamas' problem causing.

Problem is that Netenyahu trying this is what got Hamas into power in the first place because he decided he wanted a replacement govt to be a hateable enemy so I'm not too hopeful

[-] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

I think that sounds absolutely right. But I worry about while it sounds good from my armchair, to what extent it’s really possible given conditions on the ground and the hostages.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Ground invasion to search and destroy Hamas, while securing and protecting civilians.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 1 year ago

That the BBC would report on this unironically is noteworthy.

We gave Israel a free pass to treat people terribly. They treated our people terribly.

What else do they expect?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2023
676 points (95.9% liked)

World News

39371 readers
1020 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS