459
submitted 2 years ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Democrats are standing firm in their refusal to bail out the House Republican majority as it struggles to elect a new speaker 10 days after after booting Rep. Kevin McCarthy.

They're also dialing up the rhetoric against the GOP’s new nominee for speaker, prominent Donald Trump ally Jim Jordan of Ohio, blasting him as an insurrectionist, election denier and extremist.

“House Republicans have selected as their nominee to be the speaker of the people’s House the chairman of the chaos caucus, a defender in a dangerous way of dysfunction, and an extremist extraordinaire,” House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., said Friday on the steps of the Capitol, flanked by dozen of Democratic lawmakers. “His focus has been on peddling lies and conspiracy theories and driving division amongst the American people.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] danhakimi@kbin.social 163 points 2 years ago

He is an insurrectionist. See his political positions on wikipedia here. It's a well-sourced article. He also opposes

  • The ACA
  • Research on disinformation
  • The Environment, in general
  • Abortion, to the point where he said that the 10-year-old girl who got raped and needed to travel to Indiana to get an abortion was lying about it until the police arrested the guy and he confessed.
  • Regulating big tech
  • Taxes, Spending, pretty broadly
  • Same-sex marriage

He's an extremist. They do not have the political power to elect an extremist from their ranks. They need a moderate.

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 75 points 2 years ago

Don’t forget his sexual assault coverup

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 142 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Instead of "trashing Gym Jordan as an 'insurrectionist'" it should read "reminding them that Gym Jordan is an insurrectionist".

[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

No, "trash" is used appropriately.

trash (v): to subject to criticism or invective especially : to disparage strongly

[-] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

Yes but in the political landscape it implies the usual hyperbole and rhetoric. That he is an insurrectionist is a simple fact and should be treated as such.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 71 points 2 years ago

Yeah why should they help cleanup the other sides fucking mess, not like they’d get credit and cooperation if they did.

[-] hibsen@lemmy.world 39 points 2 years ago

Honestly it’s astounding that they’ve apparently managed to realize this for once. I’ll have to send a letter of thanks or something.

[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

Seriously... Treating bad faith children as if they're functioning adults is the ONLY thing Democrats are actually great at. Maybe if they start acting like there actually is something to be responsible for, this country might have a sliver of a chance.

[-] AstridWipenaugh@lemmy.world 45 points 2 years ago

Why do the Dems have to "help" the GOP? I say the GOP isn't helping the Dems! All it would take is a handful of Rs to vote with the Dems to make Jeffries the speaker.

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

deleted by creator

[-] jballs@sh.itjust.works 39 points 2 years ago

“People can talk a big game about that. I haven’t personally heard anybody talk about that; it’s only hearsay,” he said. “But I think that’s pretty nuclear. Let’s keep this conventional.”

This quote by a Republican Congressman explains absolutely everything that is wrong about the GOP. The idea of talking to Democrats to see what compromise could take place is considered a "nuclear" option. Keep in mind that had 5 districts gone the other way nationwide, Republicans would be in the minority. But they're talking as if they have an ironclad majority that demands they never compromise on anything.

This party deserves to die.

[-] Jakdracula@lemmy.world 39 points 2 years ago

They spelled his name wrong, it’s Gym Jordan.

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Gymbo to his fellow insurrectionists.

Asked what Jordan can do to change minds, Armstrong said: “Talk to people, listen to people. He’s really good at it…”

beg to fucking differ, you servile cunt

[-] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 28 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Oh he listened plenty. He just ignored them. That's what they're really interested in. They want somebody who will ignore the truth and continue to support the ongoing insurrection.

[-] kibiz0r@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

So…

The second-largest voting bloc (moderate Republicans) is angry at the first-largest voting bloc (Democrats) for voting for their preferred candidate, cuz they think they’re entitled to the votes of the third-largest voting bloc (MAGA Republicans).

Makes sense.

Edit: Not sure why I got down-dooted to oblivion right off the bat. ¯\(ツ)

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago

Fuck you mean “trashing”?

[-] MxM111@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago

Clickbait. Common in journalism nowadays.

[-] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

Defending bigotry with soft language, common in journalism nowadays.

[-] MxM111@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago
[-] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Not you, the headline trends

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] duckCityComplex@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago

At the risk of sounding like a hopeless optimist... Wouldn't it make sense for the Republicans to nominate more of a centrist with promises to work on common ground with the Democrats (whatever narrow terrain that may consist of now) and thereby sideline the MAGA crew to irrelevancy?

Yeah they would take a lot of heat from Trump & co., but maybe they could actually pass something for their constituents.

[-] mrcleanup@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

On the one hand, yes, but the Republicans made it so any one person can call for a vote to oust the speaker, so it only takes one unhappy rep to restart the cycle.

So I think the current plan is to just sit back and let the American people see that the current batch of Republican reps has as much ability to work together as a bag of weasels until the Republicans are willing to actually admit that they fucked up and ask for help fixing it.

So this could take a year to resolve.

[-] leds@feddit.dk 3 points 2 years ago

But wouldn't a moderate speaker supported by the majority from both parties easily survive a vote like that?

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 14 points 2 years ago

Their "moderates" were the anti-Trumpers.

They got primaried and voted out.

[-] mrcleanup@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

I'm sure we will find out. It sounds good in theory, but I'm not sure how many true moderates may be left. We seem to be in a "compromise is weakness stage"

[-] floppade@lemm.ee 14 points 2 years ago

Even if Dems wanted to help sincerely, why would they aid a party whose platform is to harass the shit out of everyone else. Nevermind the fact that the staffers are probably still dealing with the fear from Jan 6 in therapy; helping get Jim Jordan up of all people is voting for a dude who indirectly tried to kill you. The idea of even asking for that is so weird to me.

[-] NightLily@lemmy.basedcount.com 3 points 2 years ago
[-] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 3 points 2 years ago

House Minority Leader needs to nominate an r they can work with. That will turn up the heat.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2023
459 points (97.7% liked)

News

36011 readers
800 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS