118
submitted 2 days ago by Zerush@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml

The Delhi High Court ordered the blocking of Sci-Hub, Sci-Net, and LibGen in India on August 19, 2025, following a copyright infringement case brought by academic publishers Elsevier, Wiley, and the American Chemical Society[^5][^7].

The court found that Alexandra Elbakyan, Sci-Hub's founder, violated her December 2020 undertaking not to upload new copyrighted content by making post-2022 articles available through both Sci-Hub and a new platform called Sci-Net[^7]. While Elbakyan claimed this was due to technical errors and argued Sci-Net was a separate project, the court rejected these arguments[^7].

The ruling requires India's Department of Telecommunications and Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology to issue blocking orders within 72 hours, with Internet Service Providers required to implement the blocks within 24 hours[^7].

This case marks the first time Sci-Hub and LibGen faced legal action in a developing country[^2]. Earlier intervention attempts by Indian scientists and researchers had argued these platforms were "the only access to educational and research materials" for many academics in India[^2], with social science researchers specifically highlighting the "detrimental effect" blocking would have on research in India[^9].

[^2]: InfoJustice - Update on Publisher's Copyright Infringement Suit Against Sci-Hub

[^5]: Substack - GPT-4o about Sci-hub: The Delhi High Court's latest order

[^7]: SpicyIP - Sci-Hub now Completely Blocked in India!

[^9]: Internet Freedom Foundation - Social Science researchers move Delhi High Court

all 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] floopus@lemmy.ml 31 points 2 days ago

We really need to push for fully open access research. I believe the ACM has announced a transition to open access, so there is that. However I think there needs to be legislated open access. Specifically, any federally funded research (or research from publicly funded universities) that is to be published should be forced to be open access. In America I don't think that's going to happen for a while lmao, but hopefully other countries can do this.

[-] canihasaccount@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Any NIH-funded research must be made open access one year after its publication date. NIH publishes the accepted manuscript in PubMed at the one-year mark. Unlike NIH, (last I checked) NSF doesn't strictly require it, but you won't be getting NSF funding unless you say you're going to make the resulting papers freely available somehow (e.g., preprints, paying for open access, etc.). Not sure about DOE/DOD/etc. funded-articles.

The majority of federally funded research in the US is made open access. You might not realize it because news outlets typically report on brand-new articles, which haven't hit the one-year mark for open access yet.

[-] floopus@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

That's great to hear. In my experience every second paper I ran into needed a subscription, although I am guessing they weren't federally funded research or from a country where that isn't required by law

[-] krolden@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 days ago

Developing country? Lol what

[-] sudo_halt@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 2 days ago
[-] gi1242@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

why is the American chemical society joining with Wiley and elsivere?

[-] Networkcathode@piefed.social 5 points 2 days ago
this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2025
118 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

39598 readers
150 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS