245
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] bassomitron@lemmy.world 34 points 2 weeks ago

And anti vaxxers will make some bullshit claim, making idiots believe it, and it'll only halfway eliminate HIV.

[-] jumperalex@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago

Not just them, but the religious fuckers who want everyone to suffer "consequences" for the sin of sex. Same ones that freak out about HPV vaccine.

I know there is a lot of overlap. But it isn't total.

[-] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 weeks ago

At least this way you can save most of the smart ones.

[-] Nomad@infosec.pub 3 points 2 weeks ago

Religious people often have smart kids. They need protection.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 3 points 2 weeks ago

You know what, if you have HIV and throw your lot in with them then you've only got yourself to blame. If they had their way they'd throw you down a well for having it.

[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago

Problem is "that lot" is running the HHS (including the CDC) so people that want medicine in the US may not have access, even if they can afford it (which is becoming more unlikely than before).

Americans will find some way to blame the democrats for it tho, so the few people that actually vote will just vote in "that lot" again.

[-] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 32 points 2 weeks ago

generic versions of a groundbreaking injectable drug to prevent HIV

The two organisations have entered into separate agreements with Indian pharmaceutical companies to produce cheaper generic versions of lenacapavir – a twice-yearly injection shown to reduce the risk of HIV transmission by more than 99.9 percent – for [more than 100] low- and middle-income countries.

Marketed under the brand name Yeztugo by California-based Gilead Sciences, lenacapavir currently costs around $28,000 a year in the United States.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago

Fuck...

Why can't we have nice things?

[-] BossDj@piefed.social 2 points 2 weeks ago
[-] msage@programming.dev 1 points 2 weeks ago
[-] BossDj@piefed.social 1 points 2 weeks ago

A.K.A. Billionaire Socialism

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] selkiesidhe@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 weeks ago

Sounds like a good thing therefore the brainworm in charge of health here in the states will surely get it banned. Or at least made to cost several thousand percent more than it costs to make.

[-] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Thank goodness the west coast states have created their own health consortium and a bunch of east coast states have followed suit. I live in one of those east coast states, and just got a covid booster no questions asked. It is also covered 100% by my insurance.

[-] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

$40 a year somewhere else? That'll be $40K a year in america.

[-] Cassanderer@thelemmy.club 1 points 2 weeks ago

Not quite brainworm's fault we are getting extorted for drugs.

[-] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 10 points 2 weeks ago

Oh no! Quick! Cut their Funding!

-The USA!

[-] chiocciola@lemmy.cafe 4 points 2 weeks ago

No no, keep their funding but make a Pharmaceutical company around it and only release pills with enough potency to treat instead of cure

[-] NickwithaC@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

"Hey Jimmy, you weren't at work yesterday"

"oh, my AIDS was acting up but I took some Rubitussin, I'm fine now."

[-] MangioneDontMiss@feddit.nl 10 points 2 weeks ago

40 dollars in low income countries. 28,000 dollars in the united states. The drug is made in the united states.

WTF.

[-] sga@piefed.social 7 points 2 weeks ago

speaking as a indian - the reason that this is possible because we kinda ignore medical patents and formulations. (using kinda because i do not know the exact wording in law and the cooldown period).

It should also tell you about the cost of ingredients and manufacturing vs the costs you pay for "rnd for big companies" (who often build upon work done by universities which often are run by public fundiing)

[-] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 3 points 2 weeks ago

Those companies spend more on advertising than RND

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago

Pharmaceutical companies used to do basic research until the 90s. At this point, they are just banks who buy biotechs spun out from NIH research.

Now that NIH is gone, the industry will atrophy within a decade. There will be no new drugs.

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago

Makes you wonder if Trump has a point.

But thanks to RFK and Trump, there will be no more drugs like this in the future. Gilead did the trials, but 95% of the effort behind this was NIH funded. We can't even guess how many game changing drugs have been cut in 2025.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 weeks ago

"We can end HIV":

...as long as we can convince everyone to take it. So, yeah. Good luck with that.

[-] themurphy@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago

You can convince people of everything, if it depends on you having more sex or not.

[-] altkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago

No pills. Have sex. Die. No sex.

Yes pills. Have sex. Live. More sex.

[-] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] CXORA@aussie.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago

You don't need to convince everyone, just enough people.

Were already seeing really good progress with pills and condoms, so an option which doesn't need to be taken on a strict daily schedule will be a huge boon.

[-] Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 weeks ago

Generic versions of a groundbreaking injectable HIV-prevention drug should be available for $40 a year in more than 100 countries from 2027, Unitaid and the Gates Foundation said Wednesday.

Marketed under the brand name Yeztugo by California-based Gilead Sciences, lenacapavir currently costs around $28,000 a year in the United States.

FUCK GILEAD

[-] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

clearly they should have tried a smaller time frame to get a more reasonable price

[-] tehredmage@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 weeks ago

"Preventative drug"? Is this what we're calling vaccines now?

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

There are No vaccines for HIV. This is a drug that if taken continually will prevent the virus from taking hold.

[-] Tabula_stercore@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

It is an interesting what makes the distinction.

The core principle of vaccination is training the immune system with a substance so that a disease can be defeated later on.

Nothing says that a vaccine needs to be an injection. There are injection vaccines that need multiple doses before the immune system reaches a certain level.

So why would a pill that trains your immune system not be a vaccine?

[-] CXORA@aussie.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago

I guess a pill could be a vaccine, but this drug is neither a vaccine nor a pill, so I have no clue why youre bringing this up.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 2 weeks ago

vaccine is a scientific term, meaning a weaker (or, rather, as weak as scientifically possible) version of the same virus / bacteria, so that immune system could learn to fight it without dying in the process.

This is not a vaccine, as has an active substance, that chemically interacts either with our body, HIV's shell, or both

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] altkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 weeks ago

The Gates Foundation also announced Wednesday that it had entered into a similar partnership with Indian pharmaceutical company Hetero.

That's for bigots to not being ashamed of taking pills against sexually transmited diseases? See, Hetero is in it's very name, so it's fine!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] SpiceDealer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago

Pastors: NO! How will I condemn the gays now?!

Capitalism: That's great but what's the profit margin?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2025
245 points (100.0% liked)

Uplifting News

16858 readers
5 users here now

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews (rules), a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity and rage (e.g. schadenfreude) often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news—in text form or otherwise—that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good, from a quality outlet that does not publish bad copies of copies of copies.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS