3
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by artyom@piefed.social to c/buildapc@lemmy.world

The Framework Desktop is a deep disappointment to me. Framework, the company that got into the business with an explicit purpose of building modular and repairable computers, went into a space where that was the norm (desktops), and introduced a PC that was none of those things, at an exorbitant price. When they debuted it, it was marketed specifically as a gaming machine. As much as I want to support them, I cannot reward them for this specific product, as it abandons their fundamental tenets.

Here's the build. You can see similar builds featured on many YT channels at this point with the new NV10 case and 5060 LP GPU.

Here's one from ETA Prime

And another from "MRGUI on PC"

This build: ~$1100

Comparable Framework build: ~$1700

I will concede the Framework is still better at a few things:

  • Efficiency (I'm not sure that this is to any degree that's worth being factored in)
  • Being that it's more efficient, it's also quieter
  • Local LLMs (which no one should care about or be using)
  • A bit thinner due to not have a dGPU
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Local LLMs (which no one should care about or be using)

Yeah local LLMs are genuinely the ONLY thing the framework desktop is interesting for. For gaming, it is cheaper, more repairable, more upgradable, and more performant to just build a PC normally.

Why should no one care about or be using local LLMs, though? What a strange thing to say.

[-] artyom@piefed.social -3 points 1 week ago

Because they serve no purpose.

[-] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Is that why models on HuggingFace have monthly download counts in the millions?

[-] artyom@piefed.social -1 points 1 week ago

No, that's because people are easily duped by unprecedented investments in marketing.

[-] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Sounds like you're coping. Especially since marketing for local LLMs is not a thing.

[-] artyom@piefed.social -2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

WTF is a cope? There's no way anyone actually thinks that marketing for LLMs is not a thing so I can only surmise that your intention is to argue in bad faith or otherwise troll. In which case, goodbye.

[-] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Could you provide a single example of marketing for a local LLM?

Do you have any evidence that investment in marketing of LLMs is actually "unprecedented" or trending any differently than marketing as a whole?

I can provide an example of a purpose for a local LLM: offline translation of documents written in a foreign language.

[-] papertowels@mander.xyz 0 points 1 week ago

How much impact do you think marketing had on hugging face, considering it's free?

[-] artyom@piefed.social -1 points 1 week ago

100% of it, considering HuggingFace wouldn't exist without LLM marketing.

[-] papertowels@mander.xyz -1 points 1 week ago

Hugging face was founded in 2016

LLM marketing didn't show up on google trends until 2023.

I wonder how hugging face existed for those 7 years in between 🤔

Almost as if researchers and practitioners used LLMs before marketing hype...

[-] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It is typical anti-science conspiracy theorist "secret knowledge" mindset. People like OP want to feel like they know something others don't, so they allow themselves the delusion that, despite no personal expertise or knowledge of the topic, they actually know better than the companies risking billions on AI investments and expert researchers/academics with decades long careers in AI/ML.

They are the same as other science deniers, like anti-vaxxers believing they actually know better than doctors and medical researchers because of an anecodote they read online.

[-] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago

Wow you're REALLY buttchugging the corporate koolaid...

[-] papertowels@mander.xyz 1 points 1 week ago

claiming that working with free, open source, self hosted, privacy-focused local LLMs means you've drunk the corporate Kool aid is only further discrediting yourself on this topic...

[-] vikingtons@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I saw it more as an AI bro machine rather than gaming-centric. It happens to play games fairly decently though provisions a great deal of gfx die area in doing so.

I agree with you that it's daft for a company like framework to put that out. wouldn't it be lovely if something like strix halo could work on a socketed system, perhaps leveraging a different memory technology than DDR5 UDIMMs

[-] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

The whole point of this chip is unified memory, which can only be done using soldered memory. Using DIMMs would mean it must be typical shared memory, like any other APU/iGPU.

If the framework desktop came with a "normal" CPU/APU with non-soldered RAM, it would just be exactly the same as any other prebuilt desktop.

[-] artyom@piefed.social 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Then maybe they just shouldn't have made a desktop? It's like I said, this is a market segment that's already extremely repairable/upgradeable, and doesn't require their attention.

this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2025
3 points (71.4% liked)

Buildapc

5066 readers
14 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS