50
submitted 2 months ago by hanrahan@slrpnk.net to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world

Non paywalled version

https://archive.md/wZytx

Turns out a car is particularly inefficient.. Who knew /s

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] CEbbinghaus@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Damn, I always knew that humans are some of the most efficient beings on earth. Given the 100-200 watts we use a day powers one of the most evolved brains and one of the most capable bodies.

So it doesn't surprise me that us, powering a more efficient vehicle (such as a bike) would result in some of the highest efficiency movement anywhere on earth

[-] tate@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 2 months ago

one of the most revoked brains

?

[-] crank0271@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

If you turn on the internet for a bit it makes sense.

[-] tate@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 months ago

I guarantee that's not how it works.

[-] naught101@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Maybe you're using the internet wrong?

[-] AlphaOmega@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Yeah, but what about a bird on a bike?

[-] the_q@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 months ago

Bike Bird! Coming to Tubi this Fall!

[-] Tikiporch@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago
[-] AlphaOmega@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

European swallow

[-] LegoBrickOnFire@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

quote of the day: "Bikes allow us terrestrial folk to be more like fish."

[-] naught101@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I'm a big fan of bikes, I always ride locally. But I suspect this is assuming a paved road, and a well maintained bike, right? In wonder how that changes when you account for maintenance costs? Alternatively, what would mountain biking look like on this chart?

[-] Hawke@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

I doubt maintenance costs make much difference to the number of calories burned, although it might depend on how physical the job is that pays for maintenance.

Probably negligible though.

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago

Why have they done that with the largely meaningless background of the graph

[-] PeachMan@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

They explain the meaning of the colors if you scroll down a bit....

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I'm referring to the distracting and pointless animation of the background, not the meaning of the colours (which are used to shade largely meaningless areas of the graph)

[-] Shanedino@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

False headline are not fun, a Pelican using the ground effect had to be way not efficient.

[-] certified_expert@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I love how the plot is pretty much normalized to pigeons

this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2025
50 points (98.1% liked)

Fuck Cars

14224 readers
7 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS