19
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by GlassHalfHopeful@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world

Federal immigration officers in the Chicago area will be required to wear body cameras, a judge said Thursday after seeing tear gas and other aggressive steps used against protesters.

U.S. District Judge Sara Ellis said she was a “little startled” after seeing TV images of clashes between agents and the public during President Donald Trump’s administration’s immigration crackdown.

“I live in Chicago if folks haven’t noticed,” she said. “And I’m not blind, right?”

Every win matters. It's so important to see sensible judges.

all 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Manjushri@piefed.social 2 points 4 months ago

Ellis last week said agents in the area must wear badges, and she banned them from using certain riot control techniques against peaceful protesters and journalists.

“I’m having concerns about my order being followed,” the judge said.

“I am adding that all agents who are operating in Operation Midway Blitz are to wear body-worn cameras, and they are to be on,” Ellis said, referring to the government’s name for the crackdown.

So, to be clear, if you are assaulted by a person or person who is not wearing a badge and a camera, you should be well within your rights to use whatever force is necessary to defend yourself. Right?

[-] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago

I could easily be a copycat criminal posing as a plainclothes ICE agent trying to rob you...WAIT, both of them are trying to rob you.

[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

If all cops nationwide are wearing body cameras, it makes no sense that federal officers, who are behaving as police, are not also wearing them.

It also makes no sense they are plain clothed and masked. But I think the point is to be lawless.

[-] svc@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 points 4 months ago

"and they are to be on,” Ellis said

[-] snooggums@piefed.world 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Also said that if they don't have cameras they wouldn't be expected to use something they don't have (yet) but they would talk about it Monday.

So they will eventually be wearing cameras, but there is no timeline for when.

[-] Mirshe@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Cue boondoggle contract bidding, as per usual.

[-] jasoman@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

When pigs fly.

[-] jasoman@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

So their just criminals if they don't? Who is going to arrest them?

[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 months ago

The federal agencies this year have shown repeatedly in court their testimony is unreliable. In future cases, if the cameras were deliberately disabled or obscured or were available but 'forgotten' to be worn, and it's one party's word against the other, judges may side against the federal government more often.

[-] wizblizz@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago

Right, body cams are the issue, not that this is fucking happening in the first place.

this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2025
19 points (100.0% liked)

News

35754 readers
799 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS