45
(page 2) 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Yes there are technically differing types of people who rape kids but the distinctions are really only relevant to the people treating these child rapists, who need proper terms for diagnosis and treatment, and the community of child rapists themselves.

[-] ChetManly@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

What a disgusting piece of grifter shit

[-] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago
[-] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

hand gestures, trump voice It's called ephuba... epheeba... ephebiolphilia, folks, look it up. These girls. Women. Beautiful women, because you know, I'm only attracted to beautiful. I ran the miss USA pagent for years, you know that? I'm very proud of it. They call me up sometimes and say, "Mr. Trump, the evil, socialist communist left says beauty pagents are wrong and we have to give awards to ugly ladies with nose rings. Please come back". I have to tell them I'm just too busy saving America. But these women aren't kids. They're smart, intelligent ladies. The left hates beautiful women. They say "Donald is robbing the cradle he's a pedophile". That's fake news. Fake. News. Children don't have... well you know just look at these girls. They're very well-endowed, these ladies and I won't bow down to the evil communists. They're the pedophiles folks. Why doesn't anyone look into sleepy Joe sniffing all those girls' hair - it's creepy. But I'm attracted to beautiful. All the most beautiful things... you've seen my new bathroom, right? It's the greatest bathroom in the history of indoor plumbing... Kim told me that on the phone yesterday. He said he could see it through the window in pictures.

[-] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

This was great but at "beautiful women" he would have had a brain fart and started talking about Sydney Sweeney and how the left hates her for being beautiful. "The left hates lots of beautiful women because beautiful women all love me. They all love my big beautiful bills..." et al.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

We've reached the point where it's clear he's culpable. Now MAGA has to convince its base that what he's culpable for is different than how it appears.

And they'll fall for it. Stupids gonna stupid.

[-] saigot@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

He's not a Pedophile unless he comes from the Pedo region of Epstein Island, otherwise he's just sparkling child molester.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago
[-] Milk_Sheikh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

Lemme just hate on a woman because of her appearance real quick, nvm her active child-rape apologia

You doing okay bro?

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

I just think the looks-obsessed MAGAts with their Mar-a-Lago face, hair extensions, barbies everywhere are all overdosing on Ozempic to look slim and it has this odd effect on the face. John Donald Bowman is hitting the spike a lot now, even Bibi is claiming a beach body with his overuse of it.

It’s just weird and kind of creepy in that yet another prophecy of Gilliam’s Brazil is met.

Yeah she’s a proud fascist too but everybody else seemed to have that covered.

[-] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

That has nothing to do with anything.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

Au contraire. It’s something to do with something.

[-] Worx@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 1 month ago

Yes, technically it's ephebophilia. Also, fuck you! Don't be having sex with minors!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago

Fuuuuuuuuuck

"This is this person's view, who was there for a lot of this, but that he was into the barely legal type. Like, he liked 15-year-old girls," she continued. "I'm just giving you facts that he wasn't into, like, 8-year-olds. But he liked the very young teen types that could pass for even younger than they were, but would look legal to a passerby."

[-] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

barely legal

15

Someone explain to this bitch what "barely" means.

[-] sturmblast@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago
[-] wildcardology@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

She knows exactly what she's doing

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Wow, but somehow they can't conceive the notion that people who have cooters or dicks don't have to be dudes or gals? ???

[-] MangioneDontMiss@feddit.nl 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

goddamn this fucking talking point is spreading. Just yesterday I was watching a video where some maga piece of shit was questioning a streamer about why he thinks its wrong that adults rape 13 year olds. Pretty soon we're going to have absolutely no choice except physical violence.

for ref: https://www.reddit.com/r/CringeTikToks/comments/1ovted6/we_breathe_the_same_air_as_these_people/

[-] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

It is spreading for a reason though. There certainly is a difference between raping an 8 year old and a 16 year old. And medically it is defined as "sexual interest in prepubescent children." https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19327034/ People have started slinging the term even at guys dating 20 something year old women just because they are 50 or 60. In short, the term has been made into a dog whistle and used were it doesn't apply because it carries more negative connotations than terms like statutory rape, sexual assualt of a minor, sex trafficking.

Frankly, I think the term has been cheapened by this misuse. Now when people here someone is a pedo, instead of immediate revulsion, they have to ask, "what kind of pedo". It shouldn't be that way. All of the phrases should be bad enough that we don't need to exaggerate. So it is more the acceptance that statutory rape is ok that is the source of the problem.

That said, the motives for this talking head to say what she said are purely political. Her words aren't worth spit.

[-] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 month ago

This talking point is very popular among the right wing libertarian guys who are so offputting they cannot date their peers.

It’s also popular among Christian fascist theocrats who want to be able to date and marry children.

[-] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago

Thank God the Right is out here protecting our kids from transpeople. /sarcasm

[-] NewSocialWhoDis@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Let's be real. The right is "protecting kids from trans people" because they think transexuality is socially contagious and they don't want to fuck trans kids.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

She probably got assaulted at that age but liked it

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2025
45 points (97.9% liked)

politics

26699 readers
485 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS