16
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 4 points 2 weeks ago

Until next time, probably in a couple of weeks.

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The lobbyists of multinational surveillance capitalism oligarchs just have to make a few tweaks and bribes to have one of their operatives in the political class resubmit.

[-] ISOmorph@feddit.org 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

In the risk analysis, providers must check whether their services can be misused for the dissemination of abuse material or for contacting children. There are to be three categories for this: high, medium, and low risk. Providers in the highest category could be obliged to participate in the development of risk mitigation technologies.

We can anticipate Signal and co. will be part of the high risk category and assume the risk mitigation tech will be aimed towards breaking encryption. Especially since this new agency will be interfacing with Europol. I don't see this as a win or even a draw.

[-] goatinspace@feddit.org 2 points 2 weeks ago
[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago

Can we implement Chat-Control-Control?

Monitor all EU Parliament politicians' devices and computers to find out each time some lobbyist calls them to enact chat control. Of course, most communications have nothing to do with chat control, so they'll have nothing to hide, yes? Let's see how much they would like that.

[-] LostWanderer@fedia.io 1 points 2 weeks ago

Like US politicians, they'll keep trying in cycles. Hoping to catch people unaware.

this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2025
16 points (94.4% liked)

Privacy

7820 readers
1 users here now

A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy

Rules:

  1. Be civil
  2. No spam posting
  3. Keep posts on-topic
  4. No trolling

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS