76
top 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago

And, by "people", he means himself, I guess?

[-] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 2 weeks ago

He's the only one who exists to himself all the time

[-] dethedrus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 weeks ago

When you envision him as a solipsist, every single decision makes sense. Well that plus a malignant narcissist who squandered a fortune and made a lot of very shady 'friends' along the way.

[-] bender223@lemmy.today 3 points 2 weeks ago

he still working on object permanence he's still a developing boy 👶

[-] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yah, it’s like how he conflates himself with America when he makes fascist statements such as ‘this will destroy America.’

[-] Ludicrous0251@piefed.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago

It's the same "people" who always seem to be "saying" what he's thinking at any given moment.

[-] snooggums@piefed.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Him and the other pedos in the files.

[-] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 weeks ago

No, there are absolutely other very important wealthy people who are tied to Epstein. I saw a picture of Bezos and Eric Schmidt with Maxwell that supposedly was dated 2018.

There are going to be very important people who used Epstein and not all will be people you dislike.

[-] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

Jokes on you; I dislike everyone.

[-] ManixT@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, seriously. Going to have to try a lot harder than those two examples 😁

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago

The people who will be hurt by the release of the Epstein files are people we need to hurt.

[-] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Exactly, it's the whole point. I don't care who is there, if they were involved they need to be punished.

[-] meco03211@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

It's hilarious all the conservatives are like, "but Bill Clinton is in them too!" As if we give a flying fuck if that whole family gets destroyed from the files.

[-] mika_mika@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

Isn't this actually the argument they are making to release Maxwell from prison? That the evidence proves her so guilty that she could not possibly have a fair trial.

[-] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 weeks ago

If by 'people' we mean rich men who have no regard for other people and feel they are outside the law, then yes, people. Better to call them what they are rich criminal men. Those criminals are the ones they are afraid of hurting not the actual victims of their abuse.

[-] cuerdo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

There is only one people Trump cares about, you do the math

[-] PearOfJudes@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 weeks ago

MTG stands for Magic: The Gathering.

[-] Phegan@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

A deckmaster game.

[-] bender223@lemmy.today 8 points 2 weeks ago

yes, the correct people

[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 7 points 2 weeks ago

If it wasn't so upsetting it would be funny that the people motivated by fury over elite pedophiles elected the biggest most elite pedophile to be their president.

[-] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Release the Trump/Epstein files

[-] HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

"People" meaning him

"Hurt" meaning real consequences for his actions

[-] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago
[-] peaceful_world_view@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago
[-] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 weeks ago

*who fuck kids. There are many rich white people who do not fuck kids.

[-] peaceful_world_view@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Give me their names.

[-] bender223@lemmy.today 1 points 2 weeks ago

pediatrists....or pedos

[-] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 weeks ago

That’s the point. Protect the victims. Anyone else, prison. But yeah, that’s the whole point of releasing them. To hurt those that are involved in a human trafficking and pedophile ring.

[-] rockettaco37@feddit.nu 3 points 2 weeks ago

I'm sure it would, but lack of accountability hurts everybody

[-] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 1 points 2 weeks ago

Exactly!

If releasing a list of people who raped children would hurt those people, then I say too fucking bad maybe they need to be hurt a little bit.

[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago

That's the whole point, isn't it? Exposing criminals and charging them will hurt them in all sorts of ways. Personal responsibility suggests that if you made your own bed then you lie in it. If you get a bunch of "powerful" cohorts doing the same thing it becomes a criminal conspiracy cabal with certain protections built in. I guess they find themselves "tween" a rock and a hard place.

[-] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 3 points 2 weeks ago

"They're hurting the wrong people"

[-] U7826391786239@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago

"hurt people" as a reason not to release the files

good. the "people" in this case are child rapist pedophiles. so yes, fucking hurt them.

[-] Professorozone@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

I think Trump meant there are a lot of everyday people in the files, you know firemen, teachers, engineers , those sort of people and since he's charged with protecting his people he just wants to... I'm sorry there's just no way to justify NOT hurting the pedophiles. The victims have already come out in favor of this so I don't see that argument holding water.

[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

OK, OK... Would you perhaps be willing to elaborate on which specific people maybe?

[-] ButtermilkBiscuit@feddit.nl 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The kids trump and his friends raped weren't people. /s

[-] Sciaphobia@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The people in those files hurt children. Now I know Trump and the GOP don't actually care about children or even really pretend to, but still.

[-] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

You know, it was just boys being boys. They've got their whole futures ahead of them!

[-] P1nkman@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

^but only if they're white or really rich^

[-] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

^or good at sports^

[-] wagesj45@fedia.io 1 points 2 weeks ago

Everyone assumes he means himself, but I think this is more of a veiled threat to her safety.

[-] santa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

So hurting young women is okay, but hurting offender is not. Got it. Get F’d.

[-] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago

lol ... sounds a lot like the evangelical preacher with the million dollar private jet who asked his parishers to give more money to buy a second jet because it would save more people

(I remembered this story from a few years ago and thought it was 'a second jet' ... I was wrong ... the preacher was asking for donations to buy his FOURTH JET!!!)

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-44305873

Trump isn't running a country .... he's an evangelical preacher leading a ministry called the United States

[-] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago

It does raise a question of just how many jets a single person needs. I, myself, could make do with as few as two, but I have a large family. I'm sure someone who lived a more frugal lifestyle might struggle by with only one? But I don't see anyone needing more than three. It's just so hard to find places to park them all...

[-] Foni@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago

Who the hell on Earth needs 4 jets?

[-] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 0 points 2 weeks ago

MTG is smarter than we've been giving her credit for.

She bailed out of Congress just after her pension kicked in, and before the midterms.

She'll be a talking head/pundit, sitting on the sidelines as the GOP goes down in flames, and then run in 2028 as the MAGats new hero.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It just got too toxic when she turned on Trump. Pension was coincidence that it was only a couple months away so announce to take the heat off and stick around doing nothing.

[-] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 1 points 2 weeks ago

Other people already pointed out that she never received a credible threat from Antifa or the LGBTQ+ community. The second she made a move against Trump she saw her life was in danger.

this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2025
76 points (100.0% liked)

politics

26774 readers
1064 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS