672
Scams upon Scams (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

Insurance is a brilliant, beautiful idea. People come together to pool resources so that in the rare event that a catastrophe befalls someone, that unlucky person does not lose everything.

The idea of insurance went wrong when for-profit companies were allowed to get involved. Public insurance is cheaper and better. I'm not sure if it is still the case today, but until a few years ago public insurance in Saskatchewan cost a couple hundred bucks a year while people in other provinces were paying $1500 for the same coverage.

Here is an exhaustive list of things that were improved when it was made for-profit:

[-] bathroomconnoisseur@lemmy.ca 3 points 20 hours ago

Can confirm, SGI still exists in Saskatchewan. It is definitely more than a couple hundred bucks a year but it is nice knowing that they don't make a profit. They sent everyone a rebate a few years ago because they had a surplus

[-] drhodl@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

I'm currently having some suspect cardiac issues, but my insurance won't pay for "preventative" treatment. I t seems I have to have, and survive, an actual heart attack, in order to be reimbursed for my treatment.

So, just like car insurance, where you can claim only after an accident.

It's fucking stupid and makes no sense, because AFTER an incident is far more expensive....

[-] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 20 hours ago

I love how you pay them thousands every year, and then when you want to use insurance, you have to pay them EVEN FUCKING MORE in excesses. Then, despite paying them thousands, they argue with you and try to not pay it. WHAT THE FUCK AM I EVEN PAYING FOR??

[-] PeacefulForest@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Let’s not forget when you get hit not everything is covered, also some damages like trees falling in your car from storms etc. Is also not always covered unless you have specific and even more expensive insurance. Also you don’t even cover your own car, you cover the other persons car.

In conclusion: insurance is a fucking scam

[-] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

IDK what's worse about that, that it's called force majeure or that it translates to God hates you, so ain't paying for that.

If Bob hates you and drops a branch on your car with a chain saw, then suuuuure you might get something, after your deductible of cause, but if you've pissed off God then...

[-] nexguy@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

The point of insurance is to protect your standard of living. If you can absorb the loss of something then you don't need insurance for it(game controller for example). Most people can not absorb the sudden loss of a car(or house). So a company takes on the risk for you for a fee. That's the general idea anyway.

[-] titanicx@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago

This is a bunch of bullshit. Car insurance is a massive scam. Do you realize how many millions upon millions upon millions of dollars these companies take in and yet the minute you have to make a claim they fight tooth and nail for every single dollar to keep it in their pocket. It's bullshit it was propagated by lobbyists. Fuck that scam.

[-] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Also you are required by law to have car insurance so they can do whatever the fuck they want.

[-] titanicx@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

We can tell exactly how much fucking money these companies make by the actors they put in their commercials and you know they're not cheap. They're not working for free. And the fact that how much money their CEOs and rest of the c staff are pocketing. Just like medical insurance. It's a bunch of bullshit scam designed to line the pockets of others and push through by lobbyist and politicians that have benefited from monetary bribery.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

Even if you can absorb it your still required by law to have it. So no it's nothing like a game controller. Its nothing about protecting your standard of living.

It's about protecting others standard of living from yourself. Insurance end of the day isn't for you, it's for others. So when you fuck up they arnt punished.

To some degree yes it is for yourself but that's by far the least of its reasons for existing. To the point of it being more a happy accident then the intent.

[-] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago

Even if you can absorb it your still required by law to have it.

But the coverage you're required to have isn't for damages to YOUR car, it for you damaging MY car. YOU are required to have insurance so that when you total my car and cripple me for life, you're able to pay that. That's entirely different from a house.

[-] nexguy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

That's liability insurance and that is a requirement in order to share the road with others. The post is about their own insurance "I have to wait to get hit???" Which is the much more expensive insurance.

[-] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 1 points 22 hours ago

Well yeah, but that one is actually optional though.

[-] nexguy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

You are not required to have it. If you own the car you do not have to have full coverage.

[-] PlutoniumAcid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Most people don't know that there is mandatory insurance for damage done to others, plus optional insurance for their own car. Clearly the person in the posted image is one of these people.

[-] brownsugga@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

The main reason for car insurance is to make sure you can’t fuck someone else’s life up, that’s why it’s state mandated

[-] nexguy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

You are taking about liability insurance. The post is about the insured's car.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

Wait to get hit?

I don't think you're doing it right.

Step 1 make sure you have gap insurance.

Step 2 never make more than the minimum car payment.

Step 3 when your ready for a new car, side swipe a car on the left and drive into a brick wall on the right. Make sure there are no cameras.

Step 4 enjoy your new car.

Step 5 commit identity fraud so you can keep a low insurance premium!

Step 6 do none of this because it's all crimes. I really hope you read the instructions to the end before starting.

[-] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 day ago

I really hope you read the instructions to the end before starting.

"Remove the diskette from its protective envelope" (it stayed in the box)
"Take the diskette by one of its corners" ("What corners, it's round?")

[-] sneezycat@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 day ago

Hi, I followed your comment while reading it. I'm stuck after step 3, the police are asking lots of questions. Pls help.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

New number

Who dis?

[-] atcorebcor@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

Well because if you crash right after making the insurance there won’t be enough in your “savings”.

What if we do pay insurance and never get hit?

To me, both are not ideal. But somehow we as a society have accepted one as default and other as an extreme.

And the default one just happens to benefit the "shareholders" and not the everyday people.

(Btw the taxes we all pay could easily cover the costs of occasional accidents, and accidents could be reduced by proper regulations)

[-] atcorebcor@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 hours ago

I mean thats the point, you are paying for reducing risk. If there is enough competition between insurers the average profit they make should be quite low.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

And if you don't pay you aren't allowed to drive a car and participate in society...

Tangent: how shitty is it that owning/maintaining a car is a prerequisite to participate in society in some places.

[-] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

It sucks ass I hate it

I can't afford the work my car needs right now, and I have to do that work before I am allowed to renew my registration THAT I ALREADY PAY FOR.

So my functional car will be unregistered soon because I can't afford the mechanic repairs. -_-

This is while I'm working 40hrs/week.

I understand why people go postal, this system hates us all and wants us to suffer/die.

[-] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

the system doesn't hate you. it just doesn't care about you. it was made so car manufacturers can make a fuck ton of money

[-] stiffyGlitch@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

hi and would you like to talk about your car's extended warranty?

[-] leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 2 days ago

The idea is that what you pay goes to a fund that is used when the insurer has to pay a client, therefore socialising the costs of fixing whatever the clients insured.

If every client could get their money back, the company would likely have less money available for the payouts (and would risk everyone taking their money out once a big payout is due), and might go bankrupt if too many payouts come up at once.

So instead the idea is that ideally you end up paying less than you'd get if you needed to fix whatever you're insured for... but it's like a bet: you bet that shit'll happen before you've paid more, the insurer bets that it won't.

Of course, though, like in all businesses based on gambling the house always wins.

Even if they weren't scamming you, they've got actuarial tables telling them how much you have to pay to make sure they'll have a certain amount of profit... but of course they are scamming you, and they'll do everything possible to avoid paying you even in the unlikely event that you fall on the wrong side of the actuarial table.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 1 day ago

There is plenty to criticise about insurance companies, how did they stumble upon the one thing that is fine?

[-] brotundspiele@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's not a scam, it's just how companies work. By definition, every insurance will pay out less than they collected in payments. They have to pay their employees, their offices, taxes an yes, also their shareholders. That's why, on average, insuring something is always a loosing bet.

You should only insure yourself against things that are potentially threatening your or your family's existence: Liability, health, home, occupational disability, survivor benefits. For everything else it's almost always better to just put the money into an account to have it at hand in case.

[-] buttnugget@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

Insurance should always be public. If you feel the need to say things like “companies need to pay their shareholders,” you are only one braincell away from saying “gotta keep the lights on”.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 144 points 2 days ago

Things like insurance, home and auto need to government run and not for profit

[-] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 88 points 2 days ago

insurance, home and auto

And the biggest one: health

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] GraniteM@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

How about the fact that home insurance doesn't cover preventative care. We had a branch fall on our roof and the insurance had to pay out to get that part of the roof fixed. I pointed out that there's another dead branch up there that I'm a little concerned about hitting the roof, and maybe they would prefer to pay a few hundred to get a guy up there to remove the branch than a few thousand to get the roof repaired the next time, and the insurance company said absolutely not.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 26 points 2 days ago

Insurance is about compensation for loss, and that's it. It's not their job to keep your house safe, that's still on you. It's their job to give you money if something happens beyond your control. Now that you mentioned that other branch, you should probably take care of it, if it falls they could deny your claim since you were negligent in preventing a known risk.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] testfactor@lemmy.world 99 points 2 days ago

The biggest thing with auto insurance isn't covering your car, it's covering the cost of whatever you hit sueing you.

Your car may only be worth $3,000, but if you hit a pedestrian and they require a dozen surgeries and are wheelchair bound for life, you bet you're ass you're getting sued for a few million in medical costs.

In a reasonable country, those medical costs would be free, but since they're not you need some sort of protection against once accident bankrupting you in civil suits.

load more comments (19 replies)
[-] Devial@discuss.online 30 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The difference is that (in theory at least), insurance will pay your full costs, regardless of how much you've already paid in. You can sign an auto insurance on one day, pay in 100$, then get into a 20k$ crash the next, and get the entire costs covered.

A retirement savings fund is capped by how much money you've put in it. You can never take out more money than you've put in (+interest/portfolio growth).

That's kinda the whole point of insurance. If you want an insurance model like described in the post, well nothing is stopping you from opening an ETF or other savings fund, and dedicating it to auto payments. It's not like you need a dedicated industry/service for that.

load more comments (24 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2025
672 points (95.9% liked)

People Twitter

8715 readers
1226 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS