53
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] DFX4509B@lemmy.wtf 30 points 1 day ago

Time to move to Codeberg or Forgejo, or self-host a bare git repo.

[-] TheRealKuni@piefed.social 10 points 1 day ago

Or Gitlab. Unless Gitlab is terrible for some reason.

[-] Lazycog@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 day ago

I like your comment because I always feel like I'm so late with news that someone will always point out why my suggestion is bad or even worse than the original.

But: atleast with gitlab you can partially* self host it if they are/get bad.

*afaik gitlab's SaaS (gitlab.com) isn't entirely open-source. Not sure which bits can not be self hosted.

[-] prettybunnys@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago

You can run it self hosted and self host runners, some features are paywalled but you can work around them.

[-] Splendid4117@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago

There are two editions of Gitlab - community edition (completely open source) and enterprise edition (closed source additions). You can run CE completely free. You can actually run EE completely free too, there are just some features disabled

[-] prettybunnys@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

That’s what I am saying, you can run it free just without some of the enterprise features.

But they are all able to be worked around, you’ll just wish you had paid by the time you work around them.

[-] Splendid4117@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

Yep, just clariftying what that means in terms of open source too, which i know folks here care about

[-] prettybunnys@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

OH, I didn’t recognize the differentiation in your comment.

Makes sense.

[-] onlinepersona@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago

Gtlab will never implement federation on their own. ForgeJo is working on it as we speak.

[-] TheRealKuni@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago

Okay. The article isn’t about how GitHub isn’t federating.

[-] onlinepersona@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago

Sure, but you were talking about gitlab being terrible. I made a comment about one of its shortcomings (which isn't terrible, but not great either). If you wanted something terrible about gitlab's devops, you should said so.

[-] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

"We dont do your work and we charge you for it!"

This perversion of the "computing costs money" concept really hurts. They want you to cause them more costs, just to charge you more.

I've only used Github Actions on one project, but I found it to be terribly overengineered and overly complex. I think that's more the fault of the team than anything else, but hey, Github is run by Microsoft, so I'm pretty sure they deserve some of the blame too.

If you're self-hosting, I've found Jenkins to be pretty nice. Of course, forgejo has its own offerings as well.

[-] PokerChips@programming.dev 4 points 1 day ago

😂😂😂

this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2025
53 points (98.2% liked)

Tech

2351 readers
99 users here now

A community for high quality news and discussion around technological advancements and changes

Things that fit:

Things that don't fit

Community Wiki

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS