196
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 59 points 2 weeks ago

Am engineer. Know zero professional people in the engineering community who use AI browsers, and very few who even touch AI for anything aside from docs or stats.

In my personal life I know zero people who use these browsers. I think this is just panic from the higher ups at Mozilla who have no idea what in the fuck the company should be doing or is about, even.

Start making tools to give to people to combat this bullshit from the EU. Build a USABLE and decentralized chat app that people can actually use FFS. Build something like Proton and ACTUALLY BECOME SELF-SUFFICIENT.

Others have eaten your lunch because of this exact thing. Do better.

[-] owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca 44 points 2 weeks ago

The main use for AI that I've seen in my circles is a search engine replacement. Not because AI is a good search engine, but because search engines have largely become useless.

If Mozilla wants to cement their place, create a better search engine. It's how Google came to control a huge portion of the internet, and there's now a huge vacuum waiting for someone to replace what we lost.

[-] warm@kbin.earth 19 points 2 weeks ago

Exact same thing with anyone I know who uses it. You used to be able to type questions into search engines, now it picks one word from that question and gives you slop results.

[-] iopq@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

Why, you didn't want all of the top results to be scams?

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

AI search is useless for the same reason search engines are useless. But at least search engines force you to look at the source information and the context around it. So AI search is even more useless.

Making a better search engine solves nothing. There are several dozen of them already but Google remains on the top for a variety of reasons, including continued anticompetitive behavior and overwhelming consumer apathy. Most of the other ones aren't sustainable without using the same shady advertising Google is using. Kagi being the exception. Mozilla could definitely offer a similar paid solution.

[-] setsubyou@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

very few who even touch AI for anything aside from docs or stats

Not even translation? That’s probably the biggest browser AI feature.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] hayvan@feddit.nl 3 points 1 week ago

I feel stupid for asking but what is an AI agentic browser even supposed to do? Search things based on your query? Well search bars have been a thing since forever. 🤷

[-] ryannathans@aussie.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago

Small LLMs could be useful in-browser for automating actions - e.g. reject all cookie/tracking popups. Consent-o-matic only works for half the sites I encounter and doesn't support mobile

Security however is another rabbit hole

[-] porcoesphino@mander.xyz 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Yeah, no. LLMs are known untrustworthy so need a validation step so they aren't a great fit for any automation you don't look at... unless you don't really care about the outcome

What would work here is a browser API for cookie settings. You set your preferences with the browser and the sites check the browser. I don't think this is likely to happen because people with influence and money in tech wouldn't be able to point to how annoying the modals are and say "Look X government is doing something we don't like so you should be angry and not trust them"

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

LLMs are useful for summarization. That is it.

How often are you needing a summary of the thing that you're browsing at the moment?

[-] tofubl@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 weeks ago

Consent-o-matic does too support Firefox mobile! What makes you think it doesn't?

[-] ryannathans@aussie.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago

The mobile sites I visit don't have the cookie banners auto dismissed

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (31 replies)
[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 48 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I understand the existential pressure Mozilla faces. Their lunch is being eaten by AI browsers

Is there any data to back this up? Last I checked Firefox was still the 3rd most used browser, by a wide margin.

[-] akilou@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

How wide of a margin could it possibly be when their market share is in the single digits?

Edit: I looked it up. Their market share is 2.3%.

https://gs.statcounter.com/browser-market-share

[-] filcuk@lemmy.zip 26 points 2 weeks ago

Just be aware this doesn't represent real users for various reasons.
Chrome is also often used for bots, and god knows that internet is more than half of that these days.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] brianpeiris@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 weeks ago

I took it to mean that newer AI browsers were taking mind-share, if not market-share. I think you're right that they're minuscule in terms of actual user numbers, perhaps because there are many of them now.

[-] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 13 points 2 weeks ago

Would love more expert opinions about the different Firefox forks

[-] gointhefridge@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 weeks ago

Would love to see an iOS version. I do enjoy the FireFox functionality of seeing tabs on other devices easily.

[-] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 20 points 2 weeks ago

Iirc aren't all iOS browsers just reskinned safari?

[-] setsubyou@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

The EU forced Apple to allow other rendering engines, but implementing one costs money vs just using WebKit for free, so nobody does it.

[-] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 weeks ago

I don't understand this part:

Waterfox’s governance has allowed it to do something no other fork has (and likely will not do) - trust from other large, imporant third parties which in turn has given Waterfox users access to protected streaming services via Widevine.

[-] brianpeiris@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Widevine is the defacto standard proprietary technology for DRM-locked content. It's used by all the major streaming services like Netflix and Disney+. Without it, publishers would not make their content available to those platforms for fear of rampant piracy, especially for high quality and 4K content. I guess Widevine requires some sort of vetted relationship with any browser that wants to use their tech.

[-] sparky@lemmy.federate.cc 3 points 1 week ago

Weird how every show / movie shows up in a full 4K rip on usenet the next day still. It’s almost like DRM doesn’t stop piracy.

[-] Cybersteel@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

High quality with their shitty bitrate? Lmao.

[-] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 8 points 2 weeks ago

Their deal with Google for Widevine is separate from Mozilla, basically.

[-] kazerniel@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I was a Waterfox Classic user for a few years, while I weaned myself off classic extensions, and I'm grateful for that option. Then it started to lag more and more behind in development, and an increasing number of sites were broken in it, so I went back to vanilla Firefox, but now I wonder if I'll return to Waterfox if this LLM-craze continues...

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

you can try floorp, librewolf? ironfox breaks some sites you only do in PRIVATE , but majority are just fine.

[-] tb_@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Zen has been pretty cool too, if you don't mind the atypical UI

[-] RandomStickman@fedia.io 3 points 2 weeks ago

Been using it since near the beginning. Glad to hear!

[-] imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I really fail to se what Firefox is trying to do.

There is a sizeable amount of people who wish to stay off chromium and avoid AI entirely. Not like FF has a major % of userbase in the internet. They could've cater to those people by evading AI entirely and probably would gain much bigger user base by doing that. Spread of word and all. Why would they go the opposite way and stray even more people away from their already tiny core user amount? Doesn't make sense to me. Did they pair with OpenAI or any other AI company who paid them monnies to be brainless idiots?

[-] drspectr@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

They just got a new CEO that is likely a tech bro that wants to follow Microsoft into the abyss.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Kissaki@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago

They fear falling behind other browsers and losing users because of it.

They see AI prevalence and see it as an opportunity to profile and position Mozilla as a leader in "ethical ai".

They see AI use cases and success and think they have to integrate it to have additional, useful, significant features.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I saw/heard an interesting take from a YouTube the other day.

They argued that forks are killing Firefox. Everyone using a fork doesn't get counted in firefox's numbers, they don't see all the Linux user or people turning off AI features because we turned telemetry off. They only see the telemetry of the windows users that use the AI features everyday.

On one hand fuck Firefox's current direction and the forks are great. On the other hand, maybe we should all use Firefox for some casual stuff just to keep the numbers up??? Keep shopping and banking stuff to the privacy respecting browsers, but the random Wikipedia rabbit holes can happen in Firefox.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2025
196 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

78095 readers
798 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS