48
There’s an easy fix for this. It’s called a pricing sliding scale. The more you use, the higher your rates.
Net-metering first. Okay, both, but still...
It's ok, we'll just raise everyone's bills to pay for more power plants. What's the problem? /s
I hate to suggest privatization, but ... are private Solar plants and wind under-attack, or just grid-connected ones?
Cap (at least new)corporate/industrial grid-demand, outlaw new fossil-fuel plants, and watch the corpost fight the feds for wind-and-solar tooth-and-nail. They aren't the ones demanding/defending more coal and gas so much any more, as its not the cost-effective option.
Throw in net-metering across-the-board too.
Both. Theyre using tariffs to limit imports, took away tax credits, and are limiting the ability to build transmission and use public land
I was referring to the EPA-and-other-federal-agencies permit-revocation and refusal-to-permit bullshit.
I'm pretty sure Solar and wind are still the most economical options, even after everything you mentioned. You and I will look at these now more expensive options and go "shit, well I guess I can't afford to reduce my electric bill". Corporations either build where there is supply to meet their intended needs(running out of options), or they build the capacity themselves.
The reason I brought this up, is that those wind-and-solar farms being built by public-entities and challenged by Trump don't have the vested-interests versus a factory that's going to use, and cannot do without, the power-capacity its building itself.
Energy companies are content to keep selling from existing plants and raise prices when available supply is "low"(demand-based-pricing is profit-seeking, not "eco-friendly"). The local-and-state politicians backing the newsworthy projects only really care about fighting for them when the voters are watching or they need more campaign-money from big-Energy, who again, has no reason to care what gets built or doesn't.
From what I can tell, datacenters are choosing the expensive things like small-scale gas turbines, a large chunk of the time. Its utter insanity
It's completely sane. You just need to realize that the companies building all the new AI data centers didn't think they'll be around for very long. They know they're inflating a bubble, and don't want to make any long term investments. Ultra near-term profits are the only consideration. The people at the top of the companies will be totally fine (or even better off than before)when the bubble pops, and they're the ones making the decisions.
Small-scale gas power is disgustingly cheap and easy to get a permit for.
That said, it doesn't help that data-centers have been confused for the sort of thing that belongs in/near city-limits - there's limitted room, so solar/wind become difficult, and no city wants to permit a nuclear generator in its domain.
I am all-for banning new natural-gas build-out as well, but I approached this issue here from the state level first, since the article said Illinois, not just Chicago ...
... and again, Pritzker is not to be confused for an ally of the environment or the people, at least not where those conflict with AI and "Quantum Tech". He'll just say his constituents need to use less power at the individual/household level. For goddsakes, pressure the hell out of him, threaten to primary him or whatever, on balcony solar, net metering, and basically every solution that's been brought-up in response to this post.
The obvious short term thing to help as much as possible as fast as possible is to allow one to one power credits for home solar and such. Also specifically allow balcony solar systems.
this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2025
48 points (98.0% liked)
Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.
7693 readers
347 users here now
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:
How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:
Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:
Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS