~~This is why piefed implemented an anonymous voting option, so power tripping mods can't ban you for down voting their posts.~~
Never mind, I guess the power tripping mods got it removed.
~~This is why piefed implemented an anonymous voting option, so power tripping mods can't ban you for down voting their posts.~~
Never mind, I guess the power tripping mods got it removed.
Wasn't that option removed eventually due to it breaking social aspects of federation?
Yes, instead it was replaced with an option to have votes federate or not.
Yes, and some of us mods had automated banning proxy voting a little before the feature retirement
One could always curate their own feed instead.
I do, but I also like going on all to see what is out there. Unfortunately it can get buried when the same person is spamming a dozen submissions in a couple hours.
Just block him?
Edit to add: He posts almost exclusively to the communities he mods.
Blocking pugjeasus is the best move anyone on lemmy can do
do yourself a favor and block PugJesus. they're a turbolib that borders on fascist more often than not.
That user was one of the first that I blocked. Blocking users has made a greater positive impact on my feeds than blocking communities.
He's banned me from all his communities. Power tripper and disingenuous in how he engages
PugJesus has always rubbed me the wrong way. He always inserted whataboutisms in rambling ways which put the onus on you to figure out his esoteric points. Then you try to answer what you think he's trying to convey, and he just roasts you on that instead.
Very bad faith mod/Lemming that should be avoided should you care for your mental health
PTB/CLM.
I think that "Mass downvoting" is a valid reason for a community ban, but I would expect a temp ban if it is not a repeating behavior.
But it isn't trolling by itself. That bad qualified ban could have a bad impact in others mods or admins evaluating the OP behavior.
May be in the future, communities should choose who can vote (subscribed, instance members or any user) and then only been show in the corresponding feeds. But I suspect that most of the mods that ban downvoters don't want that they community posts don't be shown in the All feed.
Just block PJ. They're a turbolib troll. You'll feel better not seeing the junk they crank out.
~~It seems lately they've at least stopped making a thing about throwing shitfits in communities they don't control and moderate.~~
~~So as far as I am concerned: it's their mind palace. I wouldn't take their mod actions seriously or personally.~~
Nevermind they must've seen this thread and my Local feed is now filling with MeanwhileOnGrad posts about users in this thread.
Meanwhile PugJesus is banned from db0 due to stalking and mass downvoting my account, and said the admins were abusing authority for banning him while he confessed doing it with joy.
What a joke of a person he is. At least he's started to into his own echo chamber instead of trying to convert spaces into his own. I remember when he would mass report people disagreeing with him, while giving citations that said he was wrong. The mods told him to stop reporting people who weren't breaking any rules, and he told them to do it anyways.
Needless to say, PTB.
There is an option in your settings so you don't see upvotes or downvotes.

None of these imaginary points matter. I couldn't imagine spending my time wringing my hands over how others vote. Or wasting my life looking up every comment and post, agonizing over who voted and how.
But its your life though, go nuts nutzos. Consider defederating if your skin is this paper thin.
(Lemmy is rad)
I am not speaking for the user who OP referred to here, but it's not about visibility but about the impact of downvotes in terms of trying to grow and maintain a community.
If someone who doesn't like metal music enters !metal@lemmy.world and downvotes every post there - and commits themselves to doing it to every new post, this hurts their visibility across the Fediverse. Would you not say its reasonable, in this specific hypothetical, for the community owner to ban a user who does that?
Yep, it's not about being offended by downvotes. It's about stopping users from drowning all the content in a community because it didn't spark joy for them.
If we couldn't ban for that, it would give folks free license to brigade. The women and trans communities would be sunk. There would stupid pissing contests between the Fuck AI and Pro AI people, and I hate them both. It's good they can just cut the fuse by banning each other so they can stay cozy in their homes. Everyone should get to be cozy and happy in their houses, where angry letters are to be expected, but hurling rocks at the windows is discouraged.
This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.
Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.
All posts should follow this basic structure:
Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.
Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.
YPTB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.
Some acronyms you might see.
Relevant comms